CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112531

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

It concluded: “1.20 It is apparent that the mere fact that a juror is a serving policeman is not sufficient to give rise to a real risk of bias.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3214004-3585645

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2010

29 juillet 2010

  He was arrested in January 2001 - on suspicion of murdering a policeman, according to what he was told, and - on suspicion of drug-trafficking, according to what was entered in the police report

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-777928-794126

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2003

19 juin 2003

They criticised the Frederikshaven police’s handling of the investigation.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2261888-2412023

Admin. suprême

5 février 2008

5 février 2008

To that end, they should have established in particular the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police's involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD000480113

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2016

6 octobre 2016

    On 30 May 2007 the Vlora District Court ordered the Vlora Construction Police (Policia e Ndërtimit dega Vlorë) to pay the applicant 2,795,956 Albanian leks (“ALL”) for the unjustified destruction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188251

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2018

14 novembre 2018

Since it was again not entered in the Register, the lawyer complained to the court of the police’s inactivity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69952

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2005

18 juillet 2005

sA427913 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s116BEA21 { font-size:8pt }     Resolution ResDH(2005)68 concerning the violations of the right to private life by the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230866

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2024

10 janvier 2024

Moscow City Court, 04/09/2019; no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Source officielle
TJ

Ch4.3 JCP

6866f25fd33109fd079b7ad9

T. Judiciaire

3 juillet 2025

3 juillet 2025

DEMANDEUR Monsieur [J] [N] [G] [M] né le 1er Décembre 1986 à SOISSONS (02), demeurant 1 Boulevard Lech Walesa - 06000 NICE représenté par Maître David ROGUET de la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179685

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2017

29 novembre 2017

On 2   October 2011 the Pest county police requested the assistance of the police’s Anti-Terrorism Task Force (“TEK”) in the arrest of the applicant. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC000322406

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

Velenje 20/02/2006 02/07/2009   3. 22094/06 Mičo Miljevič 1963 Ljubljana 12/05/2006 04/05/2009   4. 23392/06 Igor Vodeb 1971 Celje 25/05/2006 25/05/2009   5. 30165/06 Jure Verdev 1977 Polzela

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0511DEC001711690

Admin. suprême

11 mai 1992

11 mai 1992

        The Court observed that a young plain clothes policeman had seen the film after paying 15 SFr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0313DEC002723803

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2008

13 mars 2008

In May 2003, at the first applicant’s request, the Goyty village policeman certified that there was no reason to suspect Imran Dzhambekov of involvement with illegal armed groups.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0114REP001711690

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1993

14 janvier 1993

   The Court observed that a young plain clothes policeman had seen the film after paying 15 SFr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0312JUD002723803

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2009

12 mars 2009

    The applicants then went to the house of the local policeman and asked him to go with them, but he refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0627DEC002476094

Admin. suprême

27 juin 1996

27 juin 1996

In the request they again described the events of 19 September 1992, while adding that the third applicant, in an attempt to placate the policeman and prevent the danger of further injuries to his son,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC002424494

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2001

23 octobre 2001

see his lawyer in the presence of a policeman at each occasion he had requested this.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329JUD000751218

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2022

29 mars 2022

    In connection with the disciplinary investigation, and following a request by the police’s representative by email on 1   February 2016, the same day the applicant wrote that, as regards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD003828318

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

    The police’s actions had been arbitrary. The measures taken by the police had not been foreseeable for the applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608DEC002617107

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2010

8 juin 2010

testified that the witnesses had contacted him and had told him spontaneously, prior to their excluded testimonies to the police, that the applicant had attacked members of his family with an axe; another policeman

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →