CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

542 résultats pour « Sunak »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD007543517

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

neither did it find that the applicant’s financial situation had improved since he had been granted an exemption from the payment of the court fees by the lower court (see, mutatis mutandis , Mehmet and Suna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD003120602

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

It therefore concludes that there is no need to make a separate ruling under this head (see, as an example of this practice, Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000109710

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2025

15 mai 2025

1971   Akhmetgaliyev Ramil Khaydarovich Kazan The applicant, an Islamic preacher, unsuccessfully challenged a prosecutorial caution about “extremist activity” related to his preaching of “Ahl-as-Sunna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD006668316

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

  Türkiye 09/08/2017 Suna BAŞTUĞ 1978 Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ   69856/17 Aydoğdu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303JUD003645802

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

Turkey , no. 14524/89, Commission decision of 6 January 1993, DR 74, p. 14, and Sulak v. Turkey , no.   24515/94, Commission decision of 17 January 1996, DR 84-A, p. 98).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD001494709

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2021

16 mars 2021

xa0; Dinçol GÜVEN 1951   Günay SİPAHİOĞLU 1962   Gamze UĞUZ (SİPAHİOĞLU) 1972   Dürdane Belkıs ACUN 1926 (décédée le 04/10/2008)   İclal KARAMIK 1928 (décédée le 20/01/2005)   Suna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0312DEC001311587

Admin. suprême

12 mars 1990

12 mars 1990

  Suna KAGAN                       Norrtälje 90.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC003948398

Admin. suprême

25 mai 1999

25 mai 1999

  He is represented before the Court by Mr Andrey Khramtsov, a lawyer practising in Sudak (Crimea).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-187012

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2018

21 septembre 2018

Istanbul   Metin BOZ 02/07/1976 Istanbul Muharrem BOZ 21/08/1978 Jaksonville   Muzaffer BOZ 10/04/1968 Istanbul   Nilüfer BOZ KÜÇÜK Istanbul   Nurten BOZ 10/07/1989 Istanbul   Suna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD006619110

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

The   floor in one of the rooms sunk in deeply. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE CIVIL CODE OF 1963 AND CIVIL CODE OF 2003 29 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003234702

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

  Turkey , no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v.   Turkey , no. 52658/99, § 43, 17 July 2007; K.Ö. v. Turkey , no. 71795/01, §   50, 11 December 2007). IV.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC004086907

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2013

5 novembre 2013

ÇELEBİOĞLU 15/05/1942 Istanbul            66739/12 09/12/2011 Cevher ÜREK 22/02/1952 Kocaeli   Elvan KARATAŞ        66822/12 24/08/2012 Suna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

    Until 2010 the applicant had been living in Suzak, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. He arrived in Russia in January 2011. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

A recent publication claims: ‘Democracy ... is considered a kufr [unbelievers] system, it is in clear contradiction with the Qu’ran and Sunnah’ ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0120JUD007055714

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2026

20 janvier 2026

1994 Russian Enver Fakhriyevich CHAVUSH 1996 Russian Seytmamut Dzhelyalovich SEYTUMEROV 1996 Russian Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPKOV Car procession during Crimean Tatar Deportation Remembrance Day   Sudak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702DEC000435608

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2009

2 juillet 2009

Ansar al-Sunnah and numerous other affiliates are still present and capable of carrying out deadly attacks.’ [38q] (p13) 9.67   The IOM [International Organisation for Migration]’s November 2008 report

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD003327505

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

the most appropriate form of redress would be the re-opening of the proceedings in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see Mehmet and Suna

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214416

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

Turkey 05/07/2019 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 80 42027/19 Suna v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214426

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

the Constitutional Court Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention No effective remedy to compensation Lack of reasonable suspicion 159 9999/20 Sunar

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414JUD001401107

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2009

14 avril 2009

non-enforcement of the court judgment of 6   June 2000, seen as a part of the right of an access to a court; therefore, no separate examination under Article 8 is required (see mutatis mutandis Mehmet and Suna

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 28

← PrécédentSuivant →