CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD007543517
7 juillet 2020
neither did it find that the applicant’s financial situation had improved since he had been granted an exemption from the payment of the court fees by the lower court (see, mutatis mutandis , Mehmet and Suna
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD003120602
29 septembre 2009
It therefore concludes that there is no need to make a separate ruling under this head (see, as an example of this practice, Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000109710
15 mai 2025
1971   Akhmetgaliyev Ramil Khaydarovich Kazan The applicant, an Islamic preacher, unsuccessfully challenged a prosecutorial caution about “extremist activity” related to his preaching of “Ahl-as-Sunna
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD006668316
8 juillet 2025
  Türkiye 09/08/2017 Suna BAŞTUĞ 1978 Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ   69856/17 Aydoğdu v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303JUD003645802
3 mars 2009
Turkey , no. 14524/89, Commission decision of 6 January 1993, DR 74, p. 14, and Sulak v. Turkey , no.   24515/94, Commission decision of 17 January 1996, DR 84-A, p. 98).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD001494709
16 mars 2021
xa0; Dinçol GÜVEN 1951   Günay SİPAHİOĞLU 1962   Gamze UĞUZ (SİPAHİOĞLU) 1972   Dürdane Belkıs ACUN 1926 (décédée le 04/10/2008)   İclal KARAMIK 1928 (décédée le 20/01/2005)   Suna
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0312DEC001311587
12 mars 1990
  Suna KAGAN                       Norrtälje 90.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC003948398
25 mai 1999
  He is represented before the Court by Mr Andrey Khramtsov, a lawyer practising in Sudak (Crimea).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-187012
21 septembre 2018
Istanbul   Metin BOZ 02/07/1976 Istanbul Muharrem BOZ 21/08/1978 Jaksonville   Muzaffer BOZ 10/04/1968 Istanbul   Nilüfer BOZ KÜÇÜK Istanbul   Nurten BOZ 10/07/1989 Istanbul   Suna
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD006619110
22 septembre 2022
The   floor in one of the rooms sunk in deeply. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE CIVIL CODE OF 1963 AND CIVIL CODE OF 2003 29 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003234702
14 octobre 2008
  Turkey , no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v.   Turkey , no. 52658/99, § 43, 17 July 2007; K.Ö. v. Turkey , no. 71795/01, §   50, 11 December 2007). IV.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC004086907
5 novembre 2013
ÇELEBİOĞLU 15/05/1942 Istanbul            66739/12 09/12/2011 Cevher ÜREK 22/02/1952 Kocaeli   Elvan KARATAŞ        66822/12 24/08/2012 Suna
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215
19 novembre 2019
    Until 2010 the applicant had been living in Suzak, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. He arrived in Russia in January 2011. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105
14 mars 2013
A recent publication claims: ‘Democracy ... is considered a kufr [unbelievers] system, it is in clear contradiction with the Qu’ran and Sunnah’ ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0120JUD007055714
20 janvier 2026
1994 Russian Enver Fakhriyevich CHAVUSH 1996 Russian Seytmamut Dzhelyalovich SEYTUMEROV 1996 Russian Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPKOV Car procession during Crimean Tatar Deportation Remembrance Day   Sudak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702DEC000435608
2 juillet 2009
Ansar al-Sunnah and numerous other affiliates are still present and capable of carrying out deadly attacks.’ [38q] (p13) 9.67   The IOM [International Organisation for Migration]’s November 2008 report
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD003327505
25 septembre 2012
the most appropriate form of redress would be the re-opening of the proceedings in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see Mehmet and Suna
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214416
23 novembre 2021
Turkey 05/07/2019 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 80 42027/19 Suna v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214426
the Constitutional Court Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention No effective remedy to compensation Lack of reasonable suspicion 159 9999/20 Sunar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414JUD001401107
14 avril 2009
non-enforcement of the court judgment of 6   June 2000, seen as a part of the right of an access to a court; therefore, no separate examination under Article 8 is required (see mutatis mutandis Mehmet and Suna
Page 26 sur 28