CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0121JUD006170111

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2016

21 janvier 2016

It noted that this evidence showed that the police had ordered the members of the group intercepted by them to put down the objects that they were holding in their hands and lie down on the ground, which

Page 26 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC003690902

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2007

19 juin 2007

There is no indication that the applicants formally pursued the request after receiving this letter. Since then the applicants have been unable to use the house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC005139899

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2006

22 juin 2006

The security forces had not destroyed the applicants’ village or forced them to leave their homes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC006496409

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

They had then fired in the air to warn the occupants of the car and when the occupants of the car had not heed their warning and started to drive off, they had aimed at the tyres of the car and fired.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628DEC000695402

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

They further submitted that the appalling conditions of their detention had left them unfit to participate effectively in the criminal proceedings against them. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2020

2 juin 2020

They considered that the latter had committed abuses by refusing to accompany them, while at the same time preventing them from leaving their home unaccompanied. 21 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208JUD006011912

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

On 23 June 2015, referring to their submissions of 1 April 2014, the applicants informed the Court that they wished to maintain their application, considering that as the alleged past violation of their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203623

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2020

9 juin 2020

    There is clear prima facie evidence that ... the DA and the DS cohorts are in a relevantly different situation from those others who have been treated similarly to them by their common subjection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD004229598

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2002

24 septembre 2002

It was clear from the terms of their contract of employment that they had a legitimate expectation that the tips would pass to them – but only after the tips had become the property of their employer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920DEC003833802

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2005

20 septembre 2005

proceedings and to advise the parties of their rights and duties and to invite them to adduce evidence which the court would then assess.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000931681

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1987

23 avril 1987

  In the first of these they asked that Mr. and Mrs. Mayer should be questioned, and in the second they sought their arrest because of the risk that evidence would be destroyed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705JUD003408506

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

First they went to Troitskaya village, then to Karabulak and then to Barsuki. There, he and some other officers entered the yard of the Velkhiyevs’ house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD001890702

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

They left three hand grenades in the director's room. These bombs exploded one after the other. They burned everything in the hotel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926DEC003767997

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2000

26 septembre 2000

They contend that “goodwill” is the value of their businesses based upon the profits generated by those businesses, and distinguish this from future profits per se, which they do not claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0410DEC004277598

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2003

10 avril 2003

They submit that they have exhausted this particular remedy by informing the trial court of their allegations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002888395

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2001

4 mai 2001

A road block was then set up by the police in order to stop and arrest them. They broke through the road block at high speed endangering the life of a police officer in so doing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0531DEC001265087

Admin. suprême

31 mai 1991

31 mai 1991

They had immediatly complained of the situation created by this measure which, however, remained in force until the conclusion of the consolidation proceedings in 1982, causing them important losses of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003095396

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2000

30 mai 2000

İ. lodged petitions with the Office of the Public Prosecutor they never pursued them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC002028309

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2009

13 octobre 2009

In Kazakhstan they had been treated badly for many years because of the family’s ethnicity and both neighbours and others had harassed them so they had been afraid to leave their home.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3721

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2005

13 octobre 2005

In 1990 they left Romania for Germany and in 1993 they gave up their Romanian nationality. In March 2002 the German authorities deported them to Romania.

Source officielle