CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0121JUD006170111
21 janvier 2016
It noted that this evidence showed that the police had ordered the members of the group intercepted by them to put down the objects that they were holding in their hands and lie down on the ground, which
Page 26 sur 6767
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC003690902
19 juin 2007
There is no indication that the applicants formally pursued the request after receiving this letter. Since then the applicants have been unable to use the house.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC005139899
22 juin 2006
The security forces had not destroyed the applicants’ village or forced them to leave their homes.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC006496409
19 septembre 2017
They had then fired in the air to warn the occupants of the car and when the occupants of the car had not heed their warning and started to drive off, they had aimed at the tyres of the car and fired.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628DEC000695402
28 juin 2007
They further submitted that the appalling conditions of their detention had left them unfit to participate effectively in the criminal proceedings against them. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216
2 juin 2020
They considered that the latter had committed abuses by refusing to accompany them, while at the same time preventing them from leaving their home unaccompanied. 21 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208JUD006011912
8 décembre 2015
On 23 June 2015, referring to their submissions of 1 April 2014, the applicants informed the Court that they wished to maintain their application, considering that as the alleged past violation of their
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203623
9 juin 2020
There is clear prima facie evidence that ... the DA and the DS cohorts are in a relevantly different situation from those others who have been treated similarly to them by their common subjection
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD004229598
24 septembre 2002
It was clear from the terms of their contract of employment that they had a legitimate expectation that the tips would pass to them – but only after the tips had become the property of their employer.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920DEC003833802
20 septembre 2005
proceedings and to advise the parties of their rights and duties and to invite them to adduce evidence which the court would then assess.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000931681
23 avril 1987
In the first of these they asked that Mr. and Mrs. Mayer should be questioned, and in the second they sought their arrest because of the risk that evidence would be destroyed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705JUD003408506
5 juillet 2011
First they went to Troitskaya village, then to Karabulak and then to Barsuki. There, he and some other officers entered the yard of the Velkhiyevs’ house.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD001890702
15 décembre 2009
They left three hand grenades in the director's room. These bombs exploded one after the other. They burned everything in the hotel.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926DEC003767997
26 septembre 2000
They contend that “goodwill” is the value of their businesses based upon the profits generated by those businesses, and distinguish this from future profits per se, which they do not claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0410DEC004277598
10 avril 2003
They submit that they have exhausted this particular remedy by informing the trial court of their allegations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002888395
4 mai 2001
A road block was then set up by the police in order to stop and arrest them. They broke through the road block at high speed endangering the life of a police officer in so doing.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0531DEC001265087
31 mai 1991
They had immediatly complained of the situation created by this measure which, however, remained in force until the conclusion of the consolidation proceedings in 1982, causing them important losses of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003095396
30 mai 2000
İ. lodged petitions with the Office of the Public Prosecutor they never pursued them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC002028309
13 octobre 2009
In Kazakhstan they had been treated badly for many years because of the family’s ethnicity and both neighbours and others had harassed them so they had been afraid to leave their home.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3721
13 octobre 2005
In 1990 they left Romania for Germany and in 1993 they gave up their Romanian nationality. In March 2002 the German authorities deported them to Romania.