CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

97 129 résultats pour « Thys »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0901DEC003723307

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2009

1 septembre 2009

They knocked on the door but, as nobody answered, the police opened the locked door and entered. They had found a key near the entrance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0511DEC002381094

Admin. suprême

11 mai 1994

11 mai 1994

in which they raised the claims they are now making before the Commission.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-103827

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2010

2 décembre 2010

  Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concern an infringement of the right of access to a court, and thus to a fair hearing, in that the applicant, the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC005116610

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

Thus, they would have contravened the “principle of legality”, which is an underlying principle of the whole legal system in Croatia. 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002700495

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1997

23 octobre 1997

In this connection they contend that the disqualification has no legitimate aim: the aim cannot be to avoid "double expenditure" as a SERPS earnings related element (unlike the basic flat rate pension)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC005330418

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2020

2 juin 2020

The operator relayed that information to the two officers who were already in the vicinity and they went back to the spot.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC005903019

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

They also stated that they could agree to the expropriation of the land in principle, but only if they were fairly compensated. 10 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD002984605

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The Government’s objection in this regard is thus dismissed. 55.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4010

Admin. suprême

17 février 2005

17 février 2005

In line with the practice in force, the parties could respond to the advocate-general’s submissions at the hearing and obtain, if they sought it, an adjournment of the proceedings in order to reply in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD004287510

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

If he has paid the damages, this is the end of the matter. Thus there is no recidivism or multi-recidivism in tort even though the tortfeasor may reiterate his objectionable behaviour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD003631818

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

Yet they had been paid the price of the land (as agricultural) in 1961, while they considered that they should have been paid the price of the land in 2003 – the date of the notice to treat.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2718812-2971322

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2009

28 avril 2009

the reason for their infertility; they also complain of being thus denied access to court as they   were unable to assess in a qualified manner   the position in their cases   for later

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC000027511

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2013

3 décembre 2013

The President granted the applicants’ request for their identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3). They were represented before the Court by Mr B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC002069006

Admin. suprême

23 février 2010

23 février 2010

As the applicants had been the first at the scene, they contended that they had been entitled to engage in salvage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD000880302

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2006

13 juillet 2006

This project aimed at reconstructing and repairing the infrastructure of the villages in the region and thus facilitating re-settlement of the inhabitants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1026JUD002847512

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2017

26 octobre 2017

The Court thus considers that the applicants were directly concerned by the situation whereby they had been denied access to the registered partnership, including its legal consequences, and had been referred

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204DEC000585418

Admin. suprême

4 février 2025

4 février 2025

They thus paid more tax for the same income than employed tax-payers. Moreover, the additional tax for retired tax-payers was permanent, while the one for employed tax-payers was only temporary. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD002479114

Admin. suprême

1 février 2022

1 février 2022

from the main square to the Parliament, but knows that glass is broken, and refuses to call back the people since they are not to be influenced and know themselves what they must do; this demonstrates

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7478

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2013

25 avril 2013

During the applicant’s trial all three retracted their statements claiming that they had been made under duress from the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC004666112

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2013

28 mai 2013

They noted that they would prove this if the heirs were to claim an interest in the said account. 6.

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 4857

← PrécédentSuivant →