CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0901DEC003723307
1 septembre 2009
They knocked on the door but, as nobody answered, the police opened the locked door and entered. They had found a key near the entrance.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0511DEC002381094
11 mai 1994
in which they raised the claims they are now making before the Commission.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-103827
2 décembre 2010
  Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concern an infringement of the right of access to a court, and thus to a fair hearing, in that the applicant, the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC005116610
4 juin 2013
Thus, they would have contravened the “principle of legality”, which is an underlying principle of the whole legal system in Croatia. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002700495
23 octobre 1997
In this connection they contend that the disqualification has no legitimate aim: the aim cannot be to avoid "double expenditure" as a SERPS earnings related element (unlike the basic flat rate pension)
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC005330418
2 juin 2020
The operator relayed that information to the two officers who were already in the vicinity and they went back to the spot.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC005903019
7 décembre 2021
They also stated that they could agree to the expropriation of the land in principle, but only if they were fairly compensated. 10 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD002984605
21 juin 2011
The Government’s objection in this regard is thus dismissed. 55.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4010
17 février 2005
In line with the practice in force, the parties could respond to the advocate-general’s submissions at the hearing and obtain, if they sought it, an adjournment of the proceedings in order to reply in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD004287510
3 septembre 2015
If he has paid the damages, this is the end of the matter. Thus there is no recidivism or multi-recidivism in tort even though the tortfeasor may reiterate his objectionable behaviour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD003631818
7 juillet 2020
Yet they had been paid the price of the land (as agricultural) in 1961, while they considered that they should have been paid the price of the land in 2003 – the date of the notice to treat.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2718812-2971322
28 avril 2009
the reason for their infertility; they also complain of being thus denied access to court as they   were unable to assess in a qualified manner   the position in their cases   for later
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC000027511
3 décembre 2013
The President granted the applicants’ request for their identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3). They were represented before the Court by Mr B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC002069006
23 février 2010
As the applicants had been the first at the scene, they contended that they had been entitled to engage in salvage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD000880302
13 juillet 2006
This project aimed at reconstructing and repairing the infrastructure of the villages in the region and thus facilitating re-settlement of the inhabitants.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1026JUD002847512
26 octobre 2017
The Court thus considers that the applicants were directly concerned by the situation whereby they had been denied access to the registered partnership, including its legal consequences, and had been referred
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204DEC000585418
4 février 2025
They thus paid more tax for the same income than employed tax-payers. Moreover, the additional tax for retired tax-payers was permanent, while the one for employed tax-payers was only temporary. 30.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD002479114
1 février 2022
from the main square to the Parliament, but knows that glass is broken, and refuses to call back the people since they are not to be influenced and know themselves what they must do; this demonstrates
ECLI:CEDH:002-7478
25 avril 2013
During the applicant’s trial all three retracted their statements claiming that they had been made under duress from the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC004666112
28 mai 2013
They noted that they would prove this if the heirs were to claim an interest in the said account. 6.
Page 26 sur 4857