with human rights abuses during the communist regime.

in the region of Transdniestria in 1991-1992 (see Ilaşcu and Others , cited above, § 382).

    The applicants are Russian nationals who were arrested on various dates between 2004 and 2012 on suspicion of having committed crimes in different Russian regions.

Whilst the emergency measures pursued the aim, in the public interest, of protecting tenants during the housing shortage inherited from the communist regime, and although the system thus introduced could

deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Vladimir Danilovich Mikhalchenko, is a Russian national, who was born in 1957 and lives in Kuragino, a village in the Krasnoyarsk region

He is currently serving a sentence of imprisonment in penitentiary establishment IK-15 located in the village of Potanino in the Chelyabinsk Region.

xa0; Lətif Hüseynov, President,   Lado Chanturia,   Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various

During both searches some drugs (marijuana and hashish resin) were allegedly found in his possession.

On 22 October 2015 the applicant brought his Škoda car from Poland to Russia, placing it under the temporary admission customs regime.

Zavyalov, a lawyer practicing in Yessentuki, the Stavropol Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

They lived in Mineralnyye Vody, the Stavropol Region. The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr V.M. Zavyalov, a lawyer practicing in Yessentuki, the Stavropol Region.

The Court further reiterates its findings regarding the “open spaces” where prisoners were held in an open prison and the semi-liberty regime (see Zografos and Others , cited above, §§ 91-107).

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

  Reine.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Dirdizov v. Russia , no.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

    The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their names and dates of birth are tabulated below.

  39”), Gubnyk, the Vinnytsia Region. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

in this region.

The applicant was arrested after a police search at her home had discovered various materials pertaining to organisation of the above-mentioned movement.