Article 6 § 1, in its relevant parts, provides: “1.

258 § 1 of the CC and sentencing him to a fine in the amount of 30,000 Armenian drams [1] .

As regards the second applicant’s deprivation of liberty, the Administrative Court concluded that the police actions had been in compliance with the requirements of Article   258 of the CAO since

Analogous limitations to freedom of expression were listed in Article 25 of the Lithuanian Constitution (see paragraph 61 below).

L. 441-3 in fine du code de la construction et de l'habitation, ensemble l'article 2 du code civil. » Réponse de la Cour 6.

1351 du 1382 du code civil.

It stated that A.S. had misappropriated clients' money in ten cases which it listed in detail. However, A.S. had in the meantime made good the entire damage.

In addition, it maintained the judgment of 15 July 1999 in respect of the payment of civil damages and acknowledged that the amounts had been already paid by the Ministry of Defence. 24.

They further sought, under Article 498 of the Code (see paragraph 51 in fine below), to have the corresponding entries in the register of companies annulled. 36 .

Article 192 §§ 1 and 2 of the 1974 Code of Criminal Procedure (the 1974 Code), as in force at the material time, provided that proceedings concerning publicly prosecutable offences could be initiated only

700 du code de procédure civile, outre les entiers dépens, dont distraction au profit de Me Nadia Mahjoub conformément à l'article 699 du code de procédure civile, - de condamner la société MMA IARD

450 du code de procédure civile

Sur les dépens et l'article 700 du code de procédure civile Maître [L] et son assureur la SA Allianz IARD, succombants, seront condamnés in solidum, en cause d'appel, à payer les entiers dépens et,

The offences described in this Article shall be punishable by a prison sentence of between eight days and six months and a fine of between EUR 251 and EUR 10,000, or either of these two penalties.” 25.

Subsequently, he had deceived organs of the competent civil courts about the origin of the fire and had thereby caused them to decide in his favour, obliging the B. insurance company to pay him about ATS

    Complaints about delays were provided for in Article 217a of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1952, in force until 1 March 2008. The provision was introduced in July 1999.

    The applicant instituted proceedings for enforcement of the interim contact orders and made several applications for fines to be imposed on A.W. under Article 1051 of the Code of Civil Procedure

    Under Article 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as in force at the material time, an accused person may not familiarise him or herself with the prosecution file until the end of the

The relevant articles of the Immigration Act (“the Act”), in particular Article 14 and 25 are set out in Aboya   Boa   Jean v.