Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention read as follows:   “3.

Italy [GC] - 24952/94 Judgment 18.12.2002 [GC] Article 5 Article 5-5 Compensation Absence of right to compensation in respect of allegedly unlawful detention: no violation Facts – The applicant, technical

  The applicant invokes Article 5 paras. 3 and 4 and Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention.   B.   The proceedings   5.

  The applicant invokes Article 5 paras. 3 and 4 of the Convention.     B.   The proceedings   5.

Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4

Paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Convention covers the former and paragraph 5 of Article 5 the latter.

Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4

    On 5 June, 5 August and 14 October 2003 the Uzlovaya Town Court extended the applicant's detention until 31 December 2003. 11.

Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4

Botoucharova (articles 24 § 3 et 100 § 4 du règlement). 5.

    Dès lors, il n'y a pas eu violation de l'article 5 § 1 de la Convention. B.     Article 5 § 4 de la Convention 50.

Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'art. 5-3;Violation de l'art. 5-4

The applicant invokes Article 5 paras. 1 and 4 of the Convention.   B.   The proceedings   5.

Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4

The relevant part of Article 5 §   3 reads: “3.

Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4

5 § 2 and that he had not had a remedy by which to challenge the lawfulness of his detention in accordance with Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 4.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 39.

of the Committee of Ministers; considering, however, that within this time-limit, the applicant seized the Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5