However, by letter dated 15 June 1993 the applicant's representative was notified that the conviction and sentence had been confirmed by the Confirming Officer.

VILA AMIGÓ           Mrs. M. HION           Mr.   R.

VILA AMIGÓ            Mrs    M. HION            Mr     R.

However, by letter dated 11 November 1993 the applicant's representative was notified that the conviction and sentence had been confirmed by the Confirming Officer.

  The question whether or not "facts" had been disseminated had to be examined against the general context of the impugned statement, as understood by the man in the street.

  Presumably, his relatives had been betrayed by a PKK official who had cooperated with the Turkish authorities.

He stated he had been detained since 23 November 1995 or at the latest since 24 November 1995, while the U.S. authorities had presented their request for extradition on 8 January 1996, that is forty-six

September 1993 the Tax Appeals Commission had not claimed that it had done so.

on had been withdrawn.

The applicant had previous convictions of indecent assault and buggery of young boys.

When they had left Şĸrnak, Abdulvahap had been alive. Erdoğan and Nas told the applicant that they had been with Abdulvahap for quite some time and that they had also seen the Syrian.

If we had not obeyed the orders we would have been fired."

appealed and has not yet received an answer, all documents having been destroyed; and that he has been a victim of discrimination on   grounds of his nationality.

  An expert opinion had still to be taken.

He admitted that he had been a PKK sympathiser and that he had been arrested in 1992, but the charges against him had later been dropped. 46.

It first noted that, since the Public Prosecutor had not appealed against the   author's acquittal, that decision, unlike the applicant's conviction, had not been examined by the Court of Cassation

   Everyone has the right to liberty and security of       person.

proceedings against them and that the Board had not heard a number of witnesses they had proposed.

had taken Ferhat Tepe away were policemen.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.