of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aspichi Dehwari case delivered on 27 April 2000 and transmitted on the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Examiliotis case delivered on 18 April 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Teka Ltd case delivered on 26 June 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Azevedo Moreira delivered on 30 May 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Martos Mellado Ribeiro, delivered on 30 May 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Pereira Palmeira and Sales Palmeira, delivered on 4 July 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 23 April 2003, after the expiry of the time-limit agreed to under the terms

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 31 December 2002, after the expiry of the time-limit agreed to under the terms

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Brown, delivered on 29 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Coelho Alves case delivered on 25 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jácome Allier case delivered on 4 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

Court of Human Rights in the Zuckerstätter and Reschenhofer case delivered on 24 February 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

Court of Human Rights in the case of Immo Fond'roy S.a. delivered on 22 May 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the

Court of Human Rights in the Suciu case delivered on 10   February 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case

Court of Human Rights in the Constantin case delivered on 17 February 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Petersen Lizzy case delivered on 22 April 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hyvönen case delivered on 22 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 28 January 2003, after the expiry of the time-limit agreed to under the terms

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Amaral de Sousa case delivered on 14 February 2002 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling