have earned by conducting its business (see paragraphs 16-19 above).

The building, which had a local steam heating system, did not have proper isolation and could not be optimally heated.

    The applicants have spent the greater part of their lives in Serbia.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the applicants listed in the appended table have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article   6 § 1 of the Convention

I have no contact any more with my maternal family. I have often tried to have a serious conversation with my biological mother but she just wanted to keep things on a cosy [superficial] level.

    Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

According to principle of single benefit, the applicant could not have been granted two benefits simultaneously. 47.

    The Court notes that the applicants have lodged their request for housing with the domestic administrative bodies and that they have also instituted civil proceedings before the domestic

They maintained that the highest administrative court might have accepted the applicant’s arguments and set aside the prefect’s decision. 38.

The appellants have adduced no convincing arguments to indicate that the provisions in force amount to discrimination against same-sex partners.

Furthermore, as noted above, the applicant’s allegations as regards severe back pain during the searches have not been confirmed.

  Principal facts   The applicants, Alexandre de Almeida Garrett, José Mascarenhas Falcão, Francisco Augusto Mascarenhas Falcão, Maria Teresa Mascarenhas de Oliveira Falcão de Azevedo, Maria

  Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.

in domestic law, and further that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used (see Aksoy v.

The applicant Modrânga (application no. 33328/06) also complains under Article 13 that he did not have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaints concerning the non-enforcement of

to the correct directions in law and the factors to which they were required to have regard. 15.

In the situation of possible imminent danger for the children’s well-being the authority could not have taken any less invasive measures. 21.

have a psychological impairment of such gravity. 62.

Had the applicants proved that they had suffered mental suffering their claim would have been granted and the person responsible for the accident would have been ordered to pay non ‑ pecuniary damages