The applicants listed in the Appendix complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour, as specified in the Appendix, and about the lack of the effective

    On 7 November 2008 the Râșcani District Court found in favour of M.S. and recognised her right of ownership over flat no. 21 from the unfinished condominium building.

de la SELARL FAGOT - AVOCAT, Plaidant/Postulant, avocat au barreau D'AVIGNON M.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF THE QUASHING OF THE JUDGMENTS IN THE APPLICANTS’ FAVOUR 8.

Russia , no. 3447/06, § 26, 18 February 2010) or when an applicant knew, or ought to have known, that the enforcement of the judgments in her favour was no longer possible (see, for instance, Babich and

On 1 November 2001 the Briceni District Court ruled in favour of the applicant and awarded him 350,000 Moldovan lei (MDL) (the equivalent of 30,065.89   euros (EUR) at the time).

  1, the applicant complained that the State had failed to ensure the enforcement of the binding and enforceable judgment in his favour. THE LAW 13.

By a judgment of 2 September 2002 the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the Department to calculate and pay her a pension.

On 10 April 2003 a bailiff instituted administrative proceedings against the competent administration of the Ministry which had failed to comply with the final judgment in favour of the applicants.

In a judgment of 28/05/2003, the High Court of Justice ruled in favour of the applicants and ordered the demolition of the parts of the two buildings exceeding the maximum authorised height.

The judgment in the applicant’s favour has not been fully enforced. B.

According to the applicants, the judgments in their favour remained unenforced. B.

  1 about the delayed enforcement of the judgments in their favour. The applicant in the case no.

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about delayed enforcement of the final and enforceable judgments in their favour.

    On an unspecified date the applicant lodged a claim against the authorities seeking to get compensation under the Compensation Act for non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour. 7.

They acknowledged the excessive duration of the non-enforcement of the judgment delivered in the applicants’ favour from the date the judgment had been delivered to the date it was quashed.

The applicants complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention, about the non-enforcement of the final decision rendered in the favour of the applicants.

company were found liable for having accepted financial and material contributions from a legal entity and of having made financial or material contributions by a natural person or a legal entity in favour

[V] ont signé un contrat de crédit-bail le 3 janvier 2019, portant sur la location d'une remorque forestière avec grue et une fagoteuse sur une durée de 60 mois et moyennant un loyer mensuel de 652,51