CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5474
6 décembre 2001
The State appealed against that decision, once more raising the same objection.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201745
6 février 2020
impartiality of the condition in Article 7 § 3 of Rules No. 463/2000 (see above), then in force, that a serving judge was required to seek permission from the Committee on Judicial Functions to own more
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0108DEC004349598
8 janvier 2002
from the respondent Government and the applicants’ reply dated 23 November 2001, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Terence Connell, Craig Turner, Mark Love, Jonathan Moore
ECLI:CEDH:002-14336
21 mai 2024
The central issue in the present case was whether the Constitutional Court’s application of that rule to the applicant’s case, in particular its new practice, had been proportionate to that aim and, more
ECLI:CEDH:001-126930
13 septembre 2013
From 1997 the applicant cohabited more uxorio with Mr R., a film director.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1198091-1244762
23 novembre 2004
Having regard to the circumstances of the case and more particularly to the remoteness in time and subject-matter of both sets of proceedings and to the fact that P.L.'
ECLI:CEDH:001-219407
29 août 2022
In the same vein, the applications also concern the domestic courts’ alleged failure to substantiate their preference to attach more weight to witness statements which were later repudiated (see, mutatis
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68275-68743
21 mars 2000
The Court held, by five votes to two, that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 as the proceedings, which lasted more than four years and two months, had not been excessive.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD001776016
20 février 2020
than 10 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 4 day(s) pending More than 3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1,000 57495/17 25/07/2017 Rabija MALKOČ 14/05/1960 Bihać
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0211JUD001563420
11 février 2021
than 4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 25 day(s) pending More than 4 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 7 day(s) 1,000 250 15641/20 11/03/2020 Tarik ĆOSIĆ 1972 Sarajevo Municipal Court,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD004806320
20 mai 2021
than 6 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 24 day(s) 1,000 250 48104/20 15/10/2020 Emir ISENOVIĆ 1981 Zenica Municipal Court, 21/03/2014 14/07/2014 pending More than 6 year(s
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129DEC001081517
29 novembre 2018
than 10 years and 5 months and 21 days pending More than 10 years and 5 months and 21 days pending More than 5 years and 10 months and 9 days
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516JUD001926723
16 mai 2024
and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] 19267/23 21/04/2023 Pál BANYA 1984 Karsai Dániel András Budapest 03/09/2016 pending More
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0626DEC001171305
26 juin 2006
Several requests made by the applicant to release him from detention and to apply a more lenient preventive measure were refused by the County Court in 2004.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD000640317
12 décembre 2024
day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction 1,200 31434/18 05/06/2018 Eduard Mykolayovych GREBENYUK 1970 Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych Chernigiv 18/11/2014 pending More
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1028JUD002711720
28 octobre 2021
month and 14 days 1 level of jurisdiction 4,200 45324/20 09/10/2020 Andriy Igorovych VYNOKUROV 1987 Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges 03/04/2017 pending More
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004587322
7 mai 2025
and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances 45873/22 21/09/2022 Aníbal Sérgio BAPTISTA FERNANDES 1978 Vítor Carreto Torres Vedras Izeda Prison 12/07/2018 pending More
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC001468303
6 octobre 2005
At the time of filing the complaints at issue, the [applicant] had already been staying in the EBI for more than two years.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017JUD007125016
17 octobre 2024
341 of 2000 was unconstitutional (for more details, see paragraphs 35 et seq. below). 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC004561899
29 janvier 2002
In the determination of this question, the distance between the home and place of work – whether or not it was more than 30 kms – would be irrelevant.
Page 27 sur 7138