On 31 May 1991 the applicant and forty-four other persons were committed for trial before the Milan District Court.

    The case was reconsidered by the District Court ( käräjäoikeus, tingsrätt ) of Kyrönmaa, which had replaced the District Court of Isokyrö.

s wife informed the applicant that the two District Registrars (Amtsschreiber) of the Hochdorf District Office (Amststatthalteramt) had urged her to find another lawyer for her husband if the latter wanted

Moreover, on 26   January 1995 the District Court adjourned the proceedings of its own motion to 6 June 1995.

    On 1 September 1998 the District Court held a preparatory hearing. 11.

    On 18 March 2008 the Khamovnicheskiy Court transferred the case in accordance with the territorial jurisdiction rules to the Basmannyy District Court of Moscow (“the District Court”). 9.

It provided that the president of a district court had to draw at random from the list a number of lay judges to be called to the competent district court.

On 7 April 1998 the District Court issued its judgment, finding the applicant guilty of defamation.

    On 4 May 2012 the Tsentralny District Court of Mykolayiv (“the trial court”) committed Z. for trial. 35.

    On the same day the Sovetskiy District Court of Voronezh (“the District Court”) ordered the applicant’s detention at a hearing in the presence of lawyer P.

2017 before the Chertanovskiy District Court of Moscow, respectively, had not complied with the “speediness” requirement of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.

    In 2007 the applicant’s father applied to the Simferopol District Court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea (“the District Court”), seeking to have her deprived of legal capacity on the

    On 6 July 2012 the Volsk District Court of the Saratov Region (“the Volsk District Court”) deprived the applicants of their parental authority over A. and D.

  Devant la Commission, il est représenté par Maître Henri-Philippe Sambuc, avocat au barreau de Genève.

On 26 April 2004 the Konotopskyy District Court (“the District Court”) ordered the first applicant to pay damages to the victims of the crimes.

    At 2.05 a.m. on 22 August 1998 the Horodenka District Hospital informed the Horodenka District Police Department about the incident. 22.

The Florence District Court further ordered that the applicant should pay child maintenance to M.G.

    On 5 June 2010 the Vyborgskiy District Court of St Petersburg (“the District Court”) remanded the applicant in custody.

On 18 August 1994 the Jablonec nad Nisou District Court rejected the applicants’ claim.