COMPLAINT   The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings had lasted too long.

They also complain that the proceedings lasted an unreasonably long time. THE LAW 1.

  The applicant, who was found guilty of manslaughter, complained about the length of the criminal proceedings against him, which lasted six years and 11 months, of which the Court could take into

When the application was lodged before the Court, the proceedings, were still pending and had already lasted 10 years and four months for two levels of jurisdiction. 2.

  By judgment of 31 January 1995, following a hearing held on the same day, the Magistrate convicted the applicant of fraud and attempted fraud and sentenced her to two months’ imprisonment.

Under the same Article he complained of the unfairness of the proceedings and the lack of impartiality of the domestic courts. 15.

Moreover, the criminal proceedings against the father had lasted for almost four and a half years by the time of the Court’s judgment, with substantial delays attributable to the domestic authorities.

issue had been resolved in the decision of the same court of 16 May 2000. 48.

On the same day, a judge of the Centru District Court decided to postpone the hearing, ordering the applicants' release at 5 p.m. 42.

the criminal proceedings which have lasted for four years and two months and are still pending, had been excessive.

On the same date the Dzerzhinsky District Police of Kharkiv instituted a criminal investigation into the incident. 7.

second applicant”), Elmir Rahman oglu Jabrayilov ( Elmir Rəhman oğlu Cəbrayılov – “the third applicant”), Sabuhi Sabahaddin oglu Mammadov ( Səbuhi Səbahəddin oğlu Məmmədov – “the fourth applicant”), Samir

On the same day the Deputy Prosecutor of Kharkiv Region ordered his detention on remand. On the same day the applicant was charged with tax evasion and illegal business activities.

The court relied on the same reasons and found that there was no violation of Article 5 of the Convention. 15.

    On the same date the applicant obtained access to an advocate.

Furthermore, he complained under the same Article that the proceedings had not been fair. THE LAW A.

It has thus lasted so far about ten years and six months for two levels of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 15.

    On 17 March 1992, while the applicant was abroad, a fire broke out in his warehouse and during the same night a significant number of furs were stolen.

He alleged that, suffering from multiple fractures, he had been transferred to Jilava Prison Hospital in a railway wagon, and that during the journey, which had lasted several days, he had not received

II K 47/05 had been unreasonably lengthy as they had lasted seven years. 17.     On 15 April 2005 the Opole Regional Court dismissed the complaint.