CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD002982615
4 décembre 2018
hand in introducing restrictions in a general manner without affording any degree of flexibility for determining whether limitations in specific cases are appropriate or indeed necessary (see Andrey Smirnov
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230987
16 janvier 2024
  14637/20 06/03/2020 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV 1990 Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov Kazan Art. 8 (1) – unlawful search – (1) search of the applicant’s flat on 12/09/2019, authorised on 04/09/2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD002304007
24 avril 2018
of these findings, it is not necessary to examine the applicant’s arguments concerning the other aspect of the breach of his right to mount a defence (see, mutatis mutandis , Aleksandr Vladimirovich Smirnov
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD004059717
9 juin 2020
no legal interest ( pravni interes ) in lodging such a claim, given that she did not have – nor could she have – any rights to the mortal remains, in the sense of property-related relationships ( u smislu
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD004442508
24 octobre 2013
investigator questioned the applicant without delay (namely, at the most two months after the complaint had been raised – see paragraph 23 above, and, for a converse example in the case-law, see Aleksandr Smirnov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0926JUD005866211
26 septembre 2019
failing to provide him with a lawyer and using incriminating statements made by his co-defendants following torture by the police to secure his conviction (see, mutatis mutandis , Aleksandr Vladimirovich Smirnov
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807
21 octobre 2013
Smirnov ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mr   J. Szewczyk , Mr   I. Kamiński , Mr   B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0303JUD002623011
3 mars 2016
It appears that the applicant was not interviewed until the full criminal investigation was opened on 20 March 2013, more than four years after the alleged events (compare Aleksandr Smirnov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404JUD004190720
4 avril 2024
nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§   123-28, 4 October 2016, where extreme overcrowding inside the glass cabin led the Court to the conclusion of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Andrey Smirnov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005449114
5 avril 2022
Court accepts that retention of physical evidence may be necessary in the interests of proper administration of justice, which is also a “legitimate aim” in the “general interest” of the community (see Smirnov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD007504511
28 septembre 2023
  26,000     71757/13 14/10/2013 Igor Yevgenyevich SMIRNOV 1970     On 17/07/2012 the police interviewed the applicant in connection with a murder.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC002095306
21 octobre 2008
Between 1990 and 1992 he was First Secretary of the embassy responsible for political affairs, and at the same time deputy to the Head of the KGB in Poland, General Walentij Smirnow.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0509JUD004786399
9 mai 2003
  Ustavni sud je utvrdio da je u slučaju podnositelja ustavne tužbe iscrpljen pravni put u smislu odredbi člnaka 62. stavaka 1. i 2.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223813
2 mars 2023
privacy for toilet, passive smoking Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   18974/19 21/03/2019 Ivan Alekseyevich SMIRNOV
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000220411
22 octobre 2015
discretion in determining which documents to seize, the Court has found that the lawyer’s rights under Article 8 of the Convention had been breached on that ground (see Aleksanyan , cited above, §§ 216-18; Smirnov
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611DEC006466916
11 juin 2020
overcrowding, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food   1909/18 05/12/2017 Vyacheslav Yevgenyevich SMIRNOV
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0705JUD004171606
5 juillet 2012
  41872/98, § 45, 9 December 2004; Smirnov v. Russia , no. 71362/01, §   47, 7 June 2007; Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria , no. 65755/01, §§ 40 and 41, 22 May 2008; and Mancevschi v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0430DEC001348113
30 avril 2020
  29052/18 06/09/2018 Nikolay Igorevich SMIRNOV 04/12/1995     IZ-47/4 St Petersburg 16/12/2016 to 25/11/2018 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 10 day(s) 2.9 m² Overcrowding, infestation of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC006805310
20 janvier 2015
xa0; The Court recalls that it has already held in earlier cases that the right to a passport is not a civil right, given that it is not of a pecuniary nature or otherwise of a private character (see Smirnov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206DEC001198202
6 décembre 2007
Smirnov (all complaints), Mr   D.I. Karlov (all complaints), Mr A.V. Borodin (in respect of IZ-63/1 in 2001), Mr N.R. Kofinullov (all complaints), Mr V.M. Kapitonov (all complaints), Mr V.S.
Page 27 sur 28
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.