CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

541 résultats pour « Smirou »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD002982615

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

hand in introducing restrictions in a general manner without affording any degree of flexibility for determining whether limitations in specific cases are appropriate or indeed necessary (see Andrey Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230987

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

  14637/20 06/03/2020 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV 1990 Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov Kazan Art. 8 (1) – unlawful search – (1) search of the applicant’s flat on 12/09/2019, authorised on 04/09/2019

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD002304007

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2018

24 avril 2018

of these findings, it is not necessary to examine the applicant’s arguments concerning the other aspect of the breach of his right to mount a defence (see, mutatis mutandis , Aleksandr Vladimirovich Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD004059717

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2020

9 juin 2020

no legal interest ( pravni interes ) in lodging such a claim, given that she did not have – nor could she have – any rights to the mortal remains, in the sense of property-related relationships ( u smislu

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD004442508

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2013

24 octobre 2013

investigator questioned the applicant without delay (namely, at the most two months after the complaint had been raised – see paragraph 23 above, and, for a converse example in the case-law, see Aleksandr Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0926JUD005866211

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2019

26 septembre 2019

failing to provide him with a lawyer and using incriminating statements made by his co-defendants following torture by the police to secure his conviction (see, mutatis mutandis , Aleksandr Vladimirovich Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2013

21 octobre 2013

Smirnov ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mr   J. Szewczyk , Mr   I. Kamiński , Mr   B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0303JUD002623011

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2016

3 mars 2016

It appears that the applicant was not interviewed until the full criminal investigation was opened on 20 March 2013, more than four years after the alleged events (compare Aleksandr Smirnov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404JUD004190720

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2024

4 avril 2024

nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§   123-28, 4 October 2016, where extreme overcrowding inside the glass cabin led the Court to the conclusion of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Andrey Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005449114

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2022

5 avril 2022

Court accepts that retention of physical evidence may be necessary in the interests of proper administration of justice, which is also a “legitimate aim” in the “general interest” of the community (see Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD007504511

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2023

28 septembre 2023

  26,000     71757/13 14/10/2013 Igor Yevgenyevich SMIRNOV 1970     On 17/07/2012 the police interviewed the applicant in connection with a murder.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC002095306

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

Between 1990 and 1992 he was First Secretary of the embassy responsible for political affairs, and at the same time deputy to the Head of the KGB in Poland, General Walentij Smirnow.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0509JUD004786399

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2003

9 mai 2003

  Ustavni sud je utvrdio da je u slučaju podnositelja ustavne tužbe iscrpljen pravni put u smislu odredbi člnaka 62. stavaka 1. i 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223813

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

privacy for toilet, passive smoking Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   18974/19 21/03/2019 Ivan Alekseyevich SMIRNOV

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000220411

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

discretion in determining which documents to seize, the Court has found that the lawyer’s rights under Article 8 of the Convention had been breached on that ground (see Aleksanyan , cited above, §§ 216-18; Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611DEC006466916

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

overcrowding, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food   1909/18 05/12/2017 Vyacheslav Yevgenyevich SMIRNOV

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0705JUD004171606

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2012

5 juillet 2012

  41872/98, § 45, 9 December 2004; Smirnov v. Russia , no. 71362/01, §   47, 7 June 2007; Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria , no. 65755/01, §§ 40 and 41, 22 May 2008; and Mancevschi v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0430DEC001348113

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2020

30 avril 2020

  29052/18 06/09/2018 Nikolay Igorevich SMIRNOV 04/12/1995     IZ-47/4 St Petersburg 16/12/2016 to 25/11/2018 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 10 day(s) 2.9 m² Overcrowding, infestation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC006805310

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

xa0; The Court recalls that it has already held in earlier cases that the right to a passport is not a civil right, given that it is not of a pecuniary nature or otherwise of a private character (see Smirnov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206DEC001198202

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

Smirnov (all complaints), Mr   D.I. Karlov (all complaints), Mr A.V. Borodin (in respect of IZ-63/1 in 2001), Mr N.R. Kofinullov (all complaints), Mr V.M. Kapitonov (all complaints), Mr V.S.

Source officielle

Page 27 sur 28

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.