CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1201DEC002204993
1 décembre 1993
They claimed the partition of the property. They also claimed that 419m2 of land used by the co-owners should be transferred to them or, alternatively, its value should be paid to them.
Page 27 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD002877409
18 décembre 2012
In 1997 they had moved to Andijan because of their work there but they had kept their house in Tashkent, where they were registered, and went there once a week.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC002350002
30 mars 2006
They further requested that an investigation be initiated into the destruction of their properties. On 26 January 1996 their petitions were received by this office.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10777
7 juillet 2015
They were expelled from there on 26 September 2011 when the time-limit for enforcement of the orders to leave the country expired.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108
16 décembre 2014
To this end, they maintained that, although they had tried to concentrate the hydrogen peroxide by boiling it, they had then watered it down so that it would no longer be at the necessary concentration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524JUD003271802
24 mai 2007
They referred to insufficient compensation, the poor quality of the social housing granted to them and also to a considerable delay in enforcement of the court award in their favour. 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610DEC002784107
10 juin 2010
This is not, however, the situation in the present case where the applicants were able to present their case and have their appeal examined.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0113DEC003948198
13 janvier 2004
COMPLAINT The applicants complain, under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, that they did not have a right to examine or have examined witnesses against them as their conviction was mainly based on the
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2558412-2780537
25 novembre 2008
Önder Dağdelen and Ergül Çiçekler also complained of the use by the court during their trials of confessions that had been extracted from them using torture while they were in police custody, when they
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC006731809
28 mai 2013
When she informed court staff, they isolated these three jurors until the trial judge had questioned each of them individually.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131DEC005870900
31 janvier 2006
They submitted that there were two scenarios, one the play submitted to the authorities and the other being the one in respect of which they were charged.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD006695309
19 février 2015
One of the soldiers shot G.M. in the head, the other then cut B.’s throat with a knife and subsequently shot at her with a firearm. The soldiers then ordered V.M. to make coffee for them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD000274212
4 avril 2017
In the trial bench’s view, this allowed the defence sufficient time and facilities to prepare for the case as they would be able to raise all objections concerning the recordings after their examination
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1128DEC000921002
28 novembre 2006
As they were entering the street where they lived, they noticed that a police car was behind them. They drove into the yard and stopped. The trailer protruded into the street.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD005550315
10 juin 2021
as the total time during which they were deprived of their liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0520DEC002371594
20 mai 1996
It observes that there has been a growing recognition of the vulnerability of children and the need to provide them with specific protection of their interests eg. the UN Convention on the Rights of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703DEC001321209
3 juillet 2012
They maintained contact with their father on the phone and on the Internet, N.A. constantly promising them that he would join them soon.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC000869916
6 décembre 2016
The applicants The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and their deceased relatives, and as they appear from the documents submitted by them, may be summarised as follows. a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC005870100
18 mai 2006
The women were scared to get into the APC and asked if they could walk instead. The soldiers permitted them to walk, but their eyes were tied with their own scarves.
ECLI:CEDH:003-68350-68818
23 mai 2001
For these reasons, the Court concluded that there had been no violation of Article 2 on this account.