The applicant claimed 2,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage sustained as a result of a violation of her right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. 39.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

On 13   May 2003 the court allowed this request and remitted the criminal case against the applicant for a new pre-trial investigation. 14.

    As to the objection concerning the failure of the applicant to comply with the six months time-limit, the Court recalls that, in assessing whether or not the trial was fair, regard should

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On 9 March 1995 the police started a pre-trial investigation, suspecting the applicant of, inter alia , multiple fraud.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

These statements were subsequently used for their convictions by the trial court. 5.     The details concerning the applications are indicated in the table below.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

May 2001 by which Mr B. had transferred possession of the house to Mrs B.N. was devoid of any legal effect up to the amount sufficient to satisfy the first applicant’s claims (non-pecuniary damage and trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial