The expert presumed that the price of the applicant's apartment would have risen constantly by 12   % each year for the period from 1968 to 1987.

It sufficed instead to have evidence ( prova logica ) of the criminal origin of the proceeds in question.

Question: Why have you not yet been baptised? Answer: I still have some way to go. My behaviour is not yet completely suitable.

    The Court notes that since 1974 the applicants have been unable to gain access to and to use that home.

The decision of the arbitral tribunal shall have, in respect of the parties, the force of a final judgment unless the parties have expressly agreed that it may be contested before an arbitral tribunal

Spain (no. 47792/99)   No violation Article 6 § 1 Alejandro Rodríguez Valín, a Spanish national born in 1972 and living in Corunna complained of a violation of his right of access to a court, in that

The communities in Latvia and Lithuania have been recognised by the State authorities and have legal personality.

of Article 34 and second, whether the applicants in general have complied with the six-month rule contained in Article 35 § 1.

However, the NISS appeared to have no active interest in him. SIAC further considered that his disputed British nationality would have a “protective effect”.

The latter asked not to have his identity revealed for the following reasons: “the people who committed the crime are violent and have a criminal record and that’s why I’m afraid of their threats; they

, Ljiljana Mijović (Bosnia and Herzgovina), David Thór Björgvinsson (Iceland), Mark Villiger (Liechtenstein), George Nicolaou (Cyprus), Ledi Bianku (Albania), Mihai Poalelungi (Moldova) , Judges , Alejandro

They also complained that they did not have an effective domestic remedy in this regard (Article 13 of the Convention).

The applicants are individuals that have been declared socially dangerous in accordance with Article 1 §   1 (b) of Decree no.

That court’s judgment was quashed, however, on 13 June 1995 by   Ploieşti Court of Appeal on the ground that the courts did not have jurisdiction to examine application of the nationalisation decree

As a consequence of the destruction of their homes, the applicants have no residence status or registration papers, which means that they have no access to medical care or limited access to education for

additional conditions set out in Article 87 the Criminal Code have been satisfied.

He added that he had not been aware that he should have submitted his appeal in two copies. 20 .

SECTION DECISION Application no. 12792/13 Aurelia WYSOWSKA against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 23   January 2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

    The Court observes that the relevant Convention principles have been summarised in its judgment in the case of Morice (see Morice   v.