CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523DEC001668215

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2023

23 mai 2023

Ekiz, lodged an individual application with the Constitutional Court on the applicant’s behalf, alleging that the trial court’s failure to inform the applicant before assigning him a new lawyer and the

Page 28 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD007661911

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

As regards the offence of committing an offence on behalf of an armed terrorist organisation without being a member thereof (Article 220 § 6 of the CC), the trial court reiterated its line of reasoning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003988702

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

No communication has been received by or on behalf of the applicant since. In particular no interested party has indicated a wish to pursue the application on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1885909-1980611

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2007

5 janvier 2007

The INPI did not grant the application immediately because “Budweiser Bier” had already been registered as a designation of origin on behalf of a Czechoslovak company, Budejovicky Budvar.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0228DEC000476307

Admin. suprême

28 février 2017

28 février 2017

Meanwhile, on 26 October 2010, the applicant’s representative was requested to appoint a legal representative on behalf of the applicant, as required by Rule 36 § 4 (a) of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC005772608

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

Gerasimov by 26   September 2011, on 4   November 2011 the Court sent him a letter, advising him that the failure to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant might result in the strike-out

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119DEC000011211

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

and two daughters informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 21 December 2013, expressing their wish that the applicant’s younger daughter, Ms Irina Piloyan, pursue the proceedings on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1021DEC004549599

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2003

21 octobre 2003

On 3 September 2003 the applicant’s solicitors informed the Court that they had advised the applicant’s husband, as her next-of-kin, of the option of continuing with the application on behalf of the estate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12139

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2018

23 octobre 2018

Law – Article 8 (a)     Admissibility – The Government had not contested that the first applicant had standing to lodge an application on behalf of his minor son.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-431622-432224

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2001

16 octobre 2001

  Subsequently, the applicant lodged, on his own behalf and on the behalf of his three surviving children, an action for damages in the Istanbul Administrative Court against the authorities which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245591

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2025

25 septembre 2025

It appears that in the period in which the applicant received the unemployment benefit, the Agency paid on his behalf pension contributions to the Pension Fund.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC004810121

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) The Court notes that the applicants died before the applications were lodged on their behalf

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1235064-1285643

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2005

11 janvier 2005

The INPI did not grant the application immediately because “Budweiser Bier” had already been registered as a designation of origin on behalf of a Czechoslovak company, Budejovicky Budvar.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626DEC000481910

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

    On 23 January 2006 the first applicant, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of the second applicant and their son Milan Vojnović, submitted a communication to the Human Rights Committee

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708DEC000753521

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

    On 16 October 2024 the first applicant’s lawyer signed the friendly settlement declaration sent by the Court in the name and on behalf of the deceased first applicant. 8 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304DEC003857097

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1998

4 mars 1998

       On 27 October 1994 the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal convicted the applicant of espionage on behalf of the former German Democratic Republic, pursuant to S. 99 para. 1 (1)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12902

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

it was artificial to distinguish between the two and, secondly, if it was warranted by “exceptional circumstances” precluding the affected companies from bringing the cases to the Court on their own behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC004302809

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2018

3 juillet 2018

In particular, Mr Kolobutin lodged complaints on his own behalf and on behalf of his late mother, Ms Kolobutina (see line 1 of Appendix I below).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3014180-3325912

Admin. suprême

2 février 2010

2 février 2010

The Court rejected the application in respect of those applicants, either because their lawyer had lodged the application on their behalf after their death (whereas, according to Article 34, applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166726

Admin. suprême

23 août 2016

23 août 2016

The prosecutor’s office stated that it was intervening on behalf of the defendants because they were pensioners and were in a difficult financial situation.

Source officielle