THE COMPLAINTS The applicants complained mainly about the delayed enforcement of the final and enforceable decisions rendered domestically in their favour.

In addition, the Government of Moldova undertake to ensure the urgent enforcement of the judgment of 4 June 2003 in favour of Mr Caraman.

They acknowledged “the excessive duration of the enforcement” of the final and enforceable judgments in the applicants’ favour.

If faggots want to reveal that their asses itch, does it mean we should applaud. A faggot is a faggot. If it is acceptable for you that they suck each other’s shitty knob, then you need treatment.

#Recurso de anulación — Ayudas de Estado — Ayuda otorgada por un municipio neerlandés en favor de un club de fútbol profesional — Decisión de incoación del procedimiento de investigación formal previsto

and the Kahta Municipality signed a protocol by which the Municipality declared that 18,500 new Turkish liras be paid to the applicant and the applicant declared that no claim or credit remained in favour

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 thereto, about the non-enforcement of the final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.

alleged, inter alia , that there had been a violation of their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds that the quashing of the final and binding judgment in their favour

In August   2001 the applicant instituted proceedings in the same court against the Bailiffs’ Service for failure to enforce the judgment in his favour.

In 1999 a court found in favour of the applicant company and confirmed its right to be paid MDL 20 million. Despite enforcement proceedings the applicant company only received MDL 5 million in 2004.

Likewise, although there was a clear trend in the laws and practices of member States in this sphere in favour of allowing voting by non-residents, and a significant majority in favour of an unrestricted

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES REGARDING ALL APPLICATIONS Does the impossibility to obtain enforcement of the final and binding judgments given in the applicants’ favour disclose, in the circumstances, a breach

cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions given in the applicants’ favour

On 18 March 2004 the applicants repeatedly complained to the Ministry of Justice about the non-enforcement of the judgment in their favour.

INTRUM DEBT FINANCE AG Copie exécutoire délivrée le 24 avril 2025 à : Me Maurice Fagot Me Christelle Lextrait COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES CHAMBRE CIVILE 1ère chambre

warrant was issued on 1 June 2004 and the judgment was enforced on 27 April 2005, when the Chişinău Municipal Council examined the applicant’s application on the merits and adopted a decision in his favour

Subsequently on 8   December 1993 the plaintiff lodged an application for a summary judgment in its favour on the basis of the lack of defence on the part of the applicants.

    NON-ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDGMENT OF 1 NOVEMBER 2005 IN THE APPLICANT’S FAVOUR 7.

    The applicants complained about the non-enforcement of the judgments in their favour.