CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

556 résultats pour « Orum »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD001724713

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2020

26 mai 2020

Zakhid Oruj, Azerbaijani member of parliament (2004). “[R.S.] must become a symbol of patriotism for the Azerbaijani youth.

Source officielle

Page 28 sur 28

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2014

18 mars 2014

  Oruç, a lawyer practising in Denizli (applications nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07), and Mr   R.B.   Ahues, a lawyer practising in Hanover.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD006954612

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

In some exceptional situations the Court has held that the authorities’ positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention extend to criminal law remedies (see Öneryıldız , cited above, § 93, and Oruk

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD000243006

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

    Article 6 of the Convention cannot be construed as providing for a specific form of service of court mail (see Orams v. Cyprus (dec.), no.   27841/07, 10 June 2010; Weber v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD001400012

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

had been not only unlawful, but had also caused him inconvenience in his private life, which in itself had been “a traumatic experience” and had also “degraded his human dignity ( sumenkino žmogiškąjį orumą

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0727JUD002159393

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 1998

27 juillet 1998

Ekrem Oruç died in hospital. Seven soldiers were injured by flying stones. Some fifty men and seventeen women who had taken part in the unauthorised demonstration were taken into police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003045913

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

  68798/01, 5   February 2004, and Orams v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 27841/07, 10 June 2010).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD007223011

Admin. suprême

16 février 2017

16 février 2017

the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Azerbaijani national, Ms Gozal Oruj

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD001055110

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2020

28 janvier 2020

or prosecuted may amount to a violation of Article 2, irrespective of any other types of remedy that individuals may exercise on their own initiative (see Öneryıldız , cited above, §§ 71 and 93, and Oruk

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD000944110

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2017

6 juin 2017

  13423/09, § 104, ECHR 2013) and in the context of military activities (see Oruk v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2003

12 mars 2003

, of the Istanbul Bar, Mr Hatice Korkut and Mr Kemal Bilgiç, of the İzmir Bar, Mr Mahmut Şakar and Mr   Reyhan Yalçındağ, of the Diyarbakır Bar, Mr Niyazi Bulgan, of the Gaziantep Bar, Mr Aydın Oruç

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC004622199

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

, of the Istanbul Bar, Mr Hatice Korkut and Mr Kemal Bilgiç, of the İzmir Bar, Mr Mahmut Şakar and Mr   Reyhan Yalçındağ, of the Diyarbakır Bar, Mr Niyazi Bulgan, of the Gaziantep Bar, Mr Aydın Oruç

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111DEC000849805

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2011

11 janvier 2011

and telephone calls to protest against the detention conditions of Öcalan ban from receiving visitors for 2   months 04/07/2005 21/10/2005 13/02/2006 Articles   3, 6 and   7 15921/06 Oruç

Source officielle
?

Commission des sanctions

AMF:OS:fr-amf-b8b8735c505c9b833a87ca3d7fc0d0fe16879df2

droit financier

1 janvier 2000

1 janvier 2000

�6�tϿ�/�/}ss�O�w� Z��D.DfZ�,2J�5��v��*%��[�mS�4�B .D�ZE;�B��P� ����P���ORUU�Z� W�+� ԡx�)�b��=SO)L� *�A�Mѥ{�+�l�I{�C�ѹaj�0d��WQ�����V�����լ��' � �Ǹ��1��|P���\Y��TV97�ܯ������;~�cy�MB������ � A?

Source officielle
?

Commission des sanctions

AMF:OS:fr-amf-f094b02cbb88e7efd6e8bb3f7628f0fdaf447300

droit financier

1 janvier 2000

1 janvier 2000

�6�tϿ�/�/}ss�O�w� Z��D.DfZ�,2J�5��v��*%��[�mS�4�B .D�ZE;�B��P� ����P���ORUU�Z� W�+� ԡx�)�b��=SO)L� *�A�Mѥ{�+�l�I{�C�ѹaj�0d��WQ�����V�����լ��' � �Ǹ��1��|P���\Y��TV97�ܯ������;~�cy�MB������ � A?

Source officielle
?

Commission des sanctions

AMF:OS:fr-amf-1f7ed794673cd7c51f8e86da2ddb1a3da42f497b

droit financier

1 janvier 2000

1 janvier 2000

Tp5� ,������� �7 �e������6�g�of6~�|��V��#-��ݬ�`=9��6��f��P~����U,0�2�D�Z �Yc�K}U]��ˢoru� .0�JN�a�����hQO�j������¾��宒/��� �)1�E�.t����P��t�b������q+���J�#� >stream H��WK�l9 ��*��X��Ϙ

Source officielle