Boye, lawyers practising in Hamburg and Madrid respectively. The Spanish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.-A.

  In the Court’s view, these circumstances justify the conclusion that the conduct of the applicant’s lawyer failed to respect the rule of confidentiality. 20.

Eldem, lawyers practising in Ankara; the decision to give notice of the complaint under Article 11 of the Convention to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr  

In the version applicable until 1 September 2004, Article 417 § 1, which lays down a general rule, read as follows: “1.

He also appointed an Italian lawyer M.G. 6.

Mezhlumyan, lawyers practising in Yerevan. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, and subsequently by Mr Y.

In respect of the applicants’ son the court held that the best interests of the child lay in his remaining with his parents. 10.

[P], et a abouti à la saisie de pains de cocaïne. 9. La pesée de ces produits a été réalisée en présence de M. [P]. 10. Les policiers ont par ailleurs découvert, sur la personne de M.

Davut, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 3.

Şahin, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 3.

According to the applicant, the handcuffs were too tight and he had a pain in his hand.

Puto, lawyer 9 July 2010 6. Merlika and Others, no.

Šriupša, a lawyer practising in Vilnius. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Ms   K.   Bubnytė ‑ Širmenė. 4.

De Gaetano,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Paul Mahoney,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Faris Vehabović,   Ksenija Turković,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,  

They were represented before the Court initially by Mr Pauli Kiviharju and subsequently by Mr Tomi Vähätalo, both lawyers practising in Tampere.

that Jovan Ilievski, the judge elected in respect of North Macedonia, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court) and that, accordingly, the President of the Section appointed Pauliine

Štok, a lawyer practising in Pula. 2.     The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

Vieru, a lawyer practising in Chișinău. 2.     The Moldovan Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari. The circumstances of the case 3.

Nawrocki, a lawyer practising in Leszno. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska and subsequently by Mr   J.