been made and that whatever has been omitted should have been performed. … 6.

The court ordered to reinstate the applicant, so that she could have been provided with the leave days. 20 .

AGF BELGIUM INSURANCE ayant son siège social 35 rue de Laeken 10000 BRUXELLES (BELGIQUE) Représentée par ses dirigeants légaux représentée par la SCP CARLIER-REGNIER, avoués associés à la Cour assistée

AGF BELGIUM INSURANCE ayant son siège social 35 rue de Laeken 10000 BRUXELLES (BELGIQUE) Représentée par ses dirigeants légaux représentée par la SCP CARLIER-REGNIER, avoués associés à la Cour assistée

Therefore, the scope of the cases before it is limited to the applicants’ original complaints. Their new complaints will be dealt with in separate applications. 3.

The scope of the review should be limited to the grounds indicated in the request and observations in reply.

He was reported to have allegedly committed the crime of abuse of power. He was arrested the same day and criminal proceedings were instituted against him. 13.

Article 52 Scope of guaranteed rights “1.

  The Government have submitted further observations on the merits of the complaint declared admissible on 11 August 1992.

Had the amount gone undetected, the Russian authorities would have only been deprived of the information that the money had left Russia.

The court stated that the applicants should have lodged their claim under the Extra-Judicial Rehabilitation Act.

The applicant could also have sustained the injuries when he was put in the car.

He insisted that the cold could have led to an increased risk to his life and limb.

       As to how and when the applicant could have taken such a constitutional action, the Government point out that the applicant would have had a choice.

Poland , no. 19776/04, §   67, 14 June 2011), such a complaint is beyond the scope of the present application.

[T] [W] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Mme [X] [F] épouse [W] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentés par Me Jacques AGUIRAUD de la SCP JACQUES AGUIRAUD ET PHILIPPE NOUVELLET, avocat au barreau de LYON

Décision déférée à la Cour : Arrêt du 08 Juin 2001 -Cour d'Appel de PARIS - RG n° 1999/13982 DEMANDEUR AU RECOURS EN RÉVISION Monsieur [S] [R] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Rep/assistant : la SCP

That, however, had been beyond the scope of the case at hand and, therefore, the Regional Court held that the 1984 expropriation should be considered as being a matter of fact. 25.

and the purpose for which they have been requested ...”

It further noted, however, that it did not have the Maryanivka village council records for 1945.