CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305JUD001683110
5 mars 2019
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips
Page 28 sur 42
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD005475508
14 novembre 2013
Zupančič, Ganna Yudkivska, André Potocki, Paul Lemmens, Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 22 October 2013
Chambre civile 1-2
67061e6ffde28ee4207114f2
8 octobre 2024
FINANCE exerçant sous l'enseigne 'CETELEM' prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] Représentant : Me Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD004624807
28 mars 2017
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC001906407
24 mai 2011
First, the denial of the right to make representations is not a mere formal or technical breach.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0919JUD002303704
19 septembre 2006
The applicant maintained that the District Court’s reasoning could not be dismissed as a mere mistake.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 12
68df5bcfcf4e7f1c37e1cbf9
2 octobre 2025
Marie-Andrée BAUMANN, Présidente de chambre chargée du rapport Madame Sylvie LEROY, Conseillère Madame Emmanuelle PERRIER, Vice-Présidente placée Greffier, lors des débats : Madame Mélissandre PHILÉAS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD003163210
2 mai 2017
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004897409
30 mai 2017
It considers that the applicant must have suffered stress and frustration as a result, which cannot be compensated by a mere finding of a violation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0419JUD004769007
19 avril 2012
Zupančič, Mark Villiger, Ganna Yudkivska, Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 20 March 2012, Delivers the following
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305JUD000212010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD001927308
25 février 2020
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, President, Helen Keller, María Elósegui, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC006404710
24 mai 2016
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 4 November 2010, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519DEC007112313
19 mai 2015
Josep Casadevall, President, Luis López Guerra, Ján Šikuta, Kristina Pardalos, Johannes Silvis, Valeriu Griţco, Branko Lubarda, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD003903404
14 octobre 2010
As to his argument that he stood no chance of success (see paragraph 54 above), the Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD000175011
28 mai 2019
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Helen Keller, President, Pere Pastor Vilanova, María Elósegui, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD003761710
28 août 2018
The mere fact that V. had refused to give evidence under cross-examination did not mean that use in evidence of his statement to the police was excluded by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention. II.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC006140215
5 juillet 2016
xa0; Luis López Guerra, President, Helena Jäderblom, Helen Keller, Johannes Silvis, Dmitry Dedov, Branko Lubarda, Pere Pastor Vilanova, judges, and Stephen Phillips
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC002525605
22 mai 2012
The mere polemics in the articles submitted by the applicant concerning whether the National Council had obstructed the prosecution of D.K., were not evidence that could lead the court to conclude that
Chambre sociale
679334bd54e6f046d26ca3c4
23 janvier 2025
Formation paritaire de DIJON, section EN, décision attaquée en date du 20 Février 2023, enregistrée sous le n° 21/00371 APPELANT : [B] [V] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représenté par Maître Jean-philippe