AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC002353005
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 23530/05 by Zheko Kolev DONCHEV against Bulgaria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116585
6 décembre 2012
6 décembre 2012
It has performance indicators for dealing with casework: all decisions on permission applications to be made within twelve sitting weeks of receipt of all the necessary documentation; and all hearing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118380
12 mars 2013
12 mars 2013
On 29 March 2011 the Regional Court of The Hague sitting in Arnhem ( rechtbank ), dismissed his appeal. It upheld the impugned decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC001564109
17 décembre 2020
17 décembre 2020
5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15641/09 Ivan Alekseyevich VDOVIN against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC000052216
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
s67CC2216 { width:138.53pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 522/16 Călin-Romeo COȘCODAR against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC001557318
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15573/18 Dmitriy Sergeyevich PAVLOV against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0216DEC000326518
16 février 2023
16 février 2023
également, sur la base notamment de témoignages et des études de téléphonie, l’existence d’un même mode opératoire, à savoir : un contact téléphonique anonyme des victimes par des tiers pour du baby-sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC000332524
14 mai 2024
14 mai 2024
s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 3325/24 Štefan HARABIN against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC005746800
4 mai 2004
4 mai 2004
233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 57468/00 by Jan DAŃCZAK against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-986537-1022748
28 avril 2004
28 avril 2004
RIGHTS 215 28.4.2004 Press release issued by the Registrar ELECTION OF JUDGES TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Five new judges have been elected and 13 sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141423
27 janvier 2014
27 janvier 2014
On 17 March 2005 the Court of Appeal, sitting as a panel presided over by L.A., allowed the applicant’s appeal and remitted the case to the first-instance court for fresh consideration, instructing it
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5180
27 août 2002
27 août 2002
It noted that although the CMF sitting as a disciplinary board was not a court in the eyes of domestic law, an infringement of the principle of impartiality deriving from Article 6 could be invoked before
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC003603308
18 septembre 2012
18 septembre 2012
inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 36033/08 Senad HODZIC against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6115
14 décembre 1999
14 décembre 1999
In a judgment of December 1997 the Court of Audit, sitting as a full court, held that section 3 of the above-mentioned statute was unconstitutional and contrary to Article 6 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0325DEC001553417
25 mars 2025
25 mars 2025
15534/17 Bedrettin IŞILDAK against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 25 March 2025 as a Committee composed of: Jovan Ilievski , President
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC001402904
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
.sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14029/04 by Ali NOOR MOHAMMED against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404JUD002764895
4 avril 2000
4 avril 2000
Austria , The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Sir Nicolas B ratza , President , Mr J.-P. C osta , Mr L.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243048
10 avril 2025
10 avril 2025
On 29 March 2022 the Constitutional Court, sitting in a thirteen-judge formation (plenary), found that there had been a breach of D.V.’s right to an impartial tribunal.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC003189305
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 31893/05 by Sekou and Aube Mohammed JOMANDAY against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0203DEC005176899
3 février 2004
3 février 2004
width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 51768/99 by Jan MŁYNARCZYK against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting
Source officiellePage 28 sur 2681