On 29 December 1992 M. was privatised: it was registered as a joint stock company and its shares were sold primarily to staff.

In convicting her, the court relied, among other things, on the inconsistent statements she had made at the pre-trial stage.

    By a decision of 28 September 2004, the Chamber declared the application admissible. 6.

N° G 22-81.193 F-D N° 00757 ECF 14 JUIN 2023 CASSATION PARTIELLE NON-ADMISSION M.

    On 31 January 2012 the applicant was examined by medical staff on his admission to the Mensk Prison. His state of health was found to be satisfactory. 47.

The prosecution case was based on the admissions made by the applicant in interview and, in particular, the written statements signed by him. 17.

B non admissible et des résultats d'admission du 16 janvier 2018.

In addition, at a request by the defence, all available protocols of statements made by A.K. at the various stages of the proceedings were read out at trial with the consent of all parties. 38.

The Court cannot overlook the fact that the conclusion of the investigating authorities was mainly built on the statements of the three staff members of the prison hospital.

The applicant, who showed several signs of intellectual difficulties, was not represented by a lawyer during the pre-trial stage.

That action was accompanied by a request for a stay of execution of the impugned decision.

admission nevertheless. 30.

    On 15 October 2009 another senior investigator of Daugavgrīva Prison took a statement from a member of prison staff about video surveillance in the prison; that member of staff stated that

préfecture, dans un délai de huit jours à compter de la notification de l'ordonnance à intervenir sous astreinte de 150 euros par jour de retard, afin de procéder à l'enregistrement de sa demande d'admission

It was indicated in the certificate that the SIZO had no cardiologist on its staff. 32 .

and Practice in EU Member States”, the legal criteria qualifying a person for involuntary placement in a psychiatric facility differ widely across the Member States of the European Union.

him to stay inside if he felt unfit; urged him to visit a doctor; and offered assistance.

She confirmed her previous statement (see paragraph   13 above).

in making the statement.”

However, the use as evidence of statements obtained at the pre-trial stage is not always in itself inconsistent with paragraphs 3(d) and 1 of Article 6 (art. 6-3-d, art. 6-1), provided the rights of the