CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1220JUD006107510
20 décembre 2018
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.
Page 28 sur 45955
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD001243011
3 octobre 2013
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
ADLC
ADLC:93-A-14
7 septembre 1993
relatif au projet de décret portant réglementation du prix de la prestation de service téléphonique fixe perçu par les abonnés qui mettent des installations téléphoniques à la disposition du public
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD007186213
10 mars 2020
On 6 June 2013 the trial court extended the pre-trial detention of eleven defendants, including the applicant, until 24 November 2013.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0719JUD008001512
19 juillet 2016
On 18 February 2014 the complaint concerning the length of pre-trial detention was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0521JUD002031709
21 mai 2019
On the same day the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD002807408
4 mars 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD003045408
21 juillet 2016
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD003139308
14 juin 2018
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD000611610
6 avril 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD004176319
11 mars 2021
The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD003588705
27 novembre 2012
On 16 May 2004 the Adigeni Court of First Instance decided to place the applicant in pre-trial detention for three months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD001474824
23 janvier 2025
Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicant’s pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0926JUD004507710
26 septembre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1004JUD005259509
4 octobre 2018
The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD002621113
1 décembre 2015
General provisions on pre-trial detention Article 122 “(1) As soon as the grounds for pre-trial detention cease to exist, the detention shall be lifted and the detainee released. (2) When deciding on pre-trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD002178615
26 juin 2018
If the application concerns the extension of pre-trial detention, copies of all investigation documents produced since the last decision on pre-trial detention shall be attached to the application sent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD002464910
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10491
16 décembre 2014
color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 184 April 2015 Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova (referral) - 23755/07 Judgment 16.12.2014 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-3 Reasonableness of pre-trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002910109
26 janvier 2012