CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC003979317

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

decisions found to have been made in his best interests.

Source officielle

Page 29 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0407JUD003029519

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2026

7 avril 2026

    Some applicants have either not submitted any claims for costs and expenses or have failed to substantiate them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157298

Admin. suprême

24 août 2015

24 août 2015

The authority assured that police manpower would be mobilised on the scene in sufficient numbers in order to have solid police cordons created between the two opposing parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244393

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2025

2 juillet 2025

All 125   applicants (see the appended list) are of Roma ethnic origin and claim to have lived in the settlement. Forty-eight of the applicants are minors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118JUD000604514

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2025

18 novembre 2025

They argued that the Constitutional Court should have awarded them compensation and not only found a violation of their right. 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD005528710

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2016

31 mars 2016

It is true that he could have been compelled to come to Court. However, on the basis of the judge’s finding, the grounds for which have not been impugned, that would have been a fruitless exercise.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004211798

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

I am of the view that Prison Officers do not have the power to mete out punishment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD001631413

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2018

7 juin 2018

The Court notes that the essence of the applicant’s claim is not that the State should have refrained from acting but rather that it should have taken steps to ensure adequate measures, in the context

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD004198713

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2020

10 décembre 2020

– has shown that victims speak about only one third of what they have been through, not everything.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD001984408

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2015

11 juin 2015

On that matter an expert should have given his or her opinion at trial and the applicant should have been given the opportunity to discuss these results.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015DEC003480316

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2020

15 octobre 2020

All applicants, except it would seem the applicant in application no. 56607/16, have been released from prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12776

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2020

24 mars 2020

margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 238 March 2020 Marius Alexandru

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC001803916

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2021

21 janvier 2021

All applicants have been released from prison. No response to the Court’s letters was received from the applicants.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1638771-1716994

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

  The cases have been struck out following friendly settlements in which a global sum has been awarded to the applicants in each case: 10,000   euros   (EUR) in Smoleanu , EUR   8,600

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1331639-1389422

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2005

29 juin 2005

had been awarded for the period of occupation prior to the expropriation; and that, on account of the building work, a further 1,500 sq. m of land which had become unusable should also be deemed to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC007199416

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as the action in tort had become an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC004911920

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2024

18 avril 2024

remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as the action in tort had become an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328DEC003389815

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2017

28 mars 2017

He alleged that paying compensation to the victim and paying the same amount via confiscation by equivalent means should have been considered as alternatives and therefore should not have been applied

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD003459812

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2017

1 juin 2017

He therefore could not be considered to have acted in good faith and in the public interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD000611104

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

So far they have not received any answer. 9.     On 11 October 2002 the Bucharest Court of First Instance allowed the applicants’ action in part.

Source officielle