CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0607REP001557689
7 juin 1990
He has told a story which has been simultaneously interpreted and which is accounted for in Annex I.
Page 29 sur 36
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002811495
28 septembre 1999
This practice may have stopped but it has not been forgotten.” 15.
cr
6137269fcd580146774271df
30 novembre 2005
Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué et du jugement qu'il confirme que les dirigeants de droit et de fait d'une soixantaine de sociétés, constituées en groupes et réseaux, ont, en exécution d'un p
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0801JUD001155407
1 août 2013
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kaykharova and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD002730995
20 septembre 2005
As soon as he got out, the police officers started to punch and kick him and to beat him with the butts of their guns.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202JUD002519604
2 février 2010
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Christian Democratic People’s Party v. Moldova (no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706
16 juin 2015
It came into force on 12 May 1994. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1203JUD002893521
3 décembre 2024
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of M.Ș.D. v.
édure suiviec/Claude Y
613726aacd5801467742786f
13 mars 2007
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le treize mars deux mille sept, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105DEC002557811
5 novembre 2024
The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 4 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1023JUD002192093
23 octobre 1996
The appellant must also annex any documents relied on in support of the appeal."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0219JUD001620690
19 février 1996
However, the rule goes on to list various exceptions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD001606490
10 janvier 2008
Andreas Komodromos cleaned his wounds with water, loaded his gun and told him to go back, which he did. After that the applicant was not seen again by his unit. 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0929JUD000312709
29 septembre 2011
It may be subject to editorial revision . In the case of Flisar v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0325JUD001313487
25 mars 1993
On 3 October 1985 the applicant received his fifth demerit mark for talking in the corridor. The other demerit marks were for similar conduct and for being a little late for bed on one occasion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001175585
19 mars 1991
The head of the Ludwigshafen police then ordered the three policemen to go to Saarbrücken and seek the help of the local police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907DEC000344318
7 septembre 2021
On 4 May 1984 the Prenzlauer Berg District Court ( Stadtbezirksgericht Berlin, Prenzlauer Berg ) withdrew parental custody.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1008DEC004430598
8 octobre 2002
, so that the matter may be raised yet again before the Privy Council. ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD003937519
17 janvier 2023
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Valaitis v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002098110
17 avril 2014
If our homeless people could follow the breadcrumb trail to Finland or even further, let these ladies and gentlemen also go there to marry.