In particular, as regards compensation for pecuniary damage, it decided to award the following amounts to the applicants in application no.

EUR 19,000 in respect of pecuniary damage; EUR 3,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.   3. 59194/17   Baliyeva v.

DAMAGE 6.

Romania – see point 4 of the appended table), 43,200 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR   5,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and for costs and expenses, and dismissed the remainder

Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

    Damage 6.     The applicant company claimed EUR 2,390.5 for pecuniary damage suffered as a result of the quashing of the judgment of 22   June   2002.

The Court also decided to award each applicant 5,000   euros (EUR) in respect of both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and 2,067   Russian roubles (RUB) to one of the applicants, Ms  

Of that award, 25,800   euros (EUR), plus any tax that might be chargeable in respect of that amount, were adjudicated to the applicant Mr Polák, covering all heads of damage. 3.

PECUNIARY DAMAGE The parties’ submissions 7.

The damage sustained by the applicant resulted both from the lack of minimum guarantees for anyone who purchased property off-plan in good faith and from the inability to secure a review of whether the

    Damage 8.

    Damage 1.     The applicants’ claims 12.

decided in equity on account of inherently uncertain character of damage flowing from the violation   Prepared by the Registry.

185.62pt; display:inline-block } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .s6F75C96F { width:209.76pt; display:inline-block }     PREMIÈRE SECTION DÉCISION Requête n o 71494/14 Yousef DAMARGI

Défaillant Les MMA IARD dont le siège social est : [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège Représentée par Maître Stéphan DARRACQ