The applicant and his companion continued to cohabit. However, the applicant did not recognise his daughter.

of his possessions.

Two individuals, who attempted to steal his MP3 player, stabbed him five times causing his death. 4.

counsel, or only his counsel.

    Daily health checks of Y.C. were subsequently carried out, during which his weight was checked, his blood pressure was taken and his oxygen saturation level was measured.

The applicant further argued that he had not had adequate time and facilities to confer with his lawyer and to prepare his defence.

car after his arrest.

His head had jerked and his face had hit gravel, chipping two teeth. 12.

appeal in his and his counsel’s absence. 4.

He further tried to discredit his wife. According to the expert, the applicant had been unable to realise that his behaviour was damaging his good relationship with his son.

It is his own lack of confidence in the interpreter due to his own background and impressions which is at the heart of his complaint.

Nor was his attorney present. The attorney did not indicate any reasons for his absence. 9.

from his descriptions of his improved mental health.

  His fight to get (his son) back is his full-time occupation and there is no reason to doubt that, due to this, he has not had the power to plan his own work.   It is true that Dr.

On 10   May 2001 the Płock District Court allowed his appeal in so far as he complained about the alleged leak of information about his arrest to the local press.

A district court made an order for his detention after finding strong suspicion that he had evaded taxes on some twenty occasions over a six-year period and a risk of collusion or of his destroying evidence

He was lively for his age.

to the expert making his statement at the trial.

The applicant argued, without providing further detail, that his health had declined owing to the conditions of his detention.

his sentence (contrast ibid., § 150).