CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003818203

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2011

21 juillet 2011

He further noted that the level of air pollution on K.

Source officielle

Page 29 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD000781903

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2012

10 mai 2012

Some systems allocate money prior to an election based on the results of the previous election or proof of minimum levels of support.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD000298720

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2021

10 juin 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310DEC000144905

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2009

10 mars 2009

September 2008 2,880 € 426.86 € 3,306.86 € 2   40698/05   ZALOKAR, Peter 9 year and 6 months, two levels of jurisdiction 2 December 2008 1,350 € 275.41 € 1,625.41 € 3   40738/05  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD003283720

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD003157717

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2019

17 octobre 2019

of the civil proceedings. 3,900     59003/18 29/11/2018 Katalin Czingula 22/12/1970 Madari Tibor Budapest 08/07/2011   12/06/2018   6 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 5 day(s) 3 level(s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD001870622

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0416JUD000908524

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2026

16 avril 2026

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD000920124

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD005277322

Admin. suprême

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD000462122

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2024

5 septembre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD001191623

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2024

5 septembre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD005609222

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2024

6 juin 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD003117024

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD004420405

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2018

14 juin 2018

of jurisdiction   3 months and 16 days 3 levels of jurisdiction     2 months and 5 days 3 levels of jurisdiction 1,500     31448/08 14/04/2008 Vyacheslav Anatolyevich Pogonin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD004353419

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

21/11/2019 Mykola Oleksandrovych LEVCHENKO 1979 Viktoriya Valeriyivna Tkachenko Kyiv 14/11/2014 24/04/2020 01/11/2019 pending More than 5   years and 8   months and 8   days   1 level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD006008512

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2018

29 mars 2018

    20914/13 12/03/2013 Vladimir Konstantinovich Pelagey 15/03/1956 19/11/2007   19/02/2013   5 years, 3 months and 1 day 2 levels of jurisdiction   1,200     24048/

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13823

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2022

11 octobre 2022

The applicants had been forced to live in an environment where the levels of air pollution had been recognised by the domestic authorities as being consistently and abnormally high and consumed drinking

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319DEC004209615

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2020

19 mars 2020

The applicant considered that the remedy he had available at the domestic level had not been effective since he had had to demonstrate that the domestic authorities were at fault for the harm he had suffered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1567

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

The conditions of detention in issue, which the applicant had had to endure for several years, had subjected him to an ordeal of an intensity which went beyond the level of suffering inherent in detention

Source officielle