There was no information in the case-file material as to the applicant’s medical treatment for the past six months. On 14 March 2008 the pre-trial investigation was resumed.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

2022 communicated on 12 August 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the temporary restriction imposed by the domestic trial court on the applicant’s communication with her brother

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On 2 March 2005 the applicants were arrested and placed in detention on remand on suspicion of murder.

X... sur le territoire chinois était faible et peu promue de sorte que la société Castel Frères présente sur le marché de la vente du vin depuis de longues années qui connaissait une masse d'affaires importante

On 17 March 2004 the applicant was transferred to the police ward of the Ufa Department of the Interior (hereinafter also “the Ufa police ward”), where he was held until 27 March 2004.

    It referred the case to the Court on 15 December 1997.

En ce qui concerne les marges arrières, en décembre 2003, dans les locaux de Auchan Publicité à Paris, où étaient présents des représentants d'IRTS ainsi qu'un représentant d'EMC (Casino France), il a

  Another criminal inquiry was opened in March 2003 in which two medical studies were carried out to examine whether medical negligence had taken place in the process of treating the applicant.

Before the operation the applicants were duly informed of the fact that the operation foreseen (called “Fontan”) could in any case be subject to changes during the intervention depending on the actual

    On 3 March 2005 the investigator in charge of the case ordered a post-mortem examination of the body, which was carried out on the same day.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

The applicants submit that, contrary to the provisions of domestic law, search warrants in their cases were issued by domestic courts without sufficient grounds and that some of the searches were carried

In the Lambert case, the objection was based on the fact that the telephone line which was tapped was not his own, and in the Matheron case on the fact that the tapping was carried out in proceedings to

  In the case of Hakobyan v.

    In their report of 25 March 2014 the experts concluded that A. had died as a result of acute myocardial infarction.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

In the case of Tsoroyev v.