C., the only evidence on behalf of the applicant, was read at the trial. In his statement, Dr.

au profit de la société Remade Technology compagny.

It reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

    The introductory paragraph on the front page read as follows: “The table has turned!

The relevant part of that judgment reads as follows: “Pursuant to section 362(1) of the Property Act the owner of a socially-owned immovable property is the [legal entity] recorded in the land register

At the end of the hearing, the President of the Assize Court read out the questions that the court and jury would have to answer.

The second article read that Mr   P. had allegedly no longer supported Mr   K. Otherwise the articles did not mention Mr K. and focused on Mr P.’s story.

2010, the Supreme Court did not find any basis for concluding that the provision in Section 29 of the Constitution was in contravention of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention or of Article 14 read

The Constitutional Court ultimately dismissed the applicants’ claims, stating that the average reader would not consider the events narrated in the book as facts about real people.

Rezar et Kaplan, s’efforçaient de trouver des irrégularités dans la vie politique et privée du président du parti libéral autrichien, M. Rauter. L’article indiquait aussi que M.

Under Article 8, read in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, he further complained that German law does not provide an effective remedy for expediting protracted court proceedings in family

No reply was received to the Registry’s letter although both the letter and its annexes on the eComms platform were read.

The applicant further complains under Article 14 read in conjunction with Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention that he suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of

It appears that the court relied primarily on the submissions of the victims, whose depositions had been played or read out at the hearing.

In a judgment delivered on 8 June 2021, the Court held that there had been a violation of the applicant association’s rights under Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 9 on account

The applicant complains of a violation of his rights under Article 3, 8, and 13 of the Convention as well as under Article 14 read in conjunction with his other complaints.

They complain under Article 14 of the Convention read together with Article   6 § 1 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

  The applicants were convicted based on the statements that several witnesses gave during the police investigation, which were later read in court.

Witness C. apologised for not attending the main hearing and her statement given on 8 August 2006 was therefore read out.

  3713 read as follows: “Any person who disseminates propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation shall be liable to [serve] a term of imprisonment of one to five years ...” THE LAW I.