The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and their deceased relatives, and as they appear from the documents submitted by them, may be summarised as follows. a.

    The applicants also alleged that they had no domestic remedies available to them in respect of their complaints under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Convention.

In these circumstances, the Court is not persuaded that the applicants' claims regarding the risks that they might face in Iran on the basis of their religion were meaningfully examined by the domestic

The police officers then subjected Mr Satybalov, Mr M.Ch. and Mr M.G. to beatings, hitting them with the butts of their machine guns and kicking them.

They were then escorted out of the restricted zone. Neither their recording equipment nor recorded interviews were confiscated. 9.

The applicants were incapable of helping their daughters to develop their personalities, as they were ill-equipped to understand them or to treat them in an appropriate manner.

They contend that “goodwill” is the value of their businesses based upon the profits generated by those businesses, and distinguish this from future profits per se, which they do not claim.

They invoke in this respect Article 6 of the Convention.

There remained few stopping places upon which they could   lawfully park their caravan whilst travelling in the area and they faced the threat of continual eviction.

The men kicked the first applicant and beat him with their machine guns. They further aimed their guns at both applicants and ordered them to be silent.

Without any explanation they forced the third and fourth applicants to lie on the floor, kicked them a few times and then put black plastic bags over their heads.

    The applicants complained that a reduction in their benefit payments discriminated against them on the basis of their disability and gender. 4.

The prosecutor found that while there were certain discrepancies between their statements made at the beginning of the investigation and later on, these did not amount to the criminal offence of giving

The security forces had not destroyed the applicants’ village or forced them to leave their homes.

It was accepted that there was a real risk that the applicants would be executed but, as they were being held within another sovereign State, they did not fall within the UK’s jurisdiction, and the UK

They argued that the limitation of their restitution claim under section 6 (3) of the Act violated their constitutional rights, and they requested the Regional Court to initiate proceedings before the

On their way to the police station, they made phone calls to some of their colleagues at OL! and informed them about the incident.

On their way to the police station, they made phone calls to some of their colleagues at OL! and informed them about the incident.

They had enrolled their children at the İmam-Hatip Secondary Schools in the belief that they would receive an education consistent with their religious convictions.