CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

85 résultats pour « Cécile Janura »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105DEC003245596

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2002

5 novembre 2002

The court quoted the following views of Cemil Bayık in its judgment: “[T]he war in the south has shown that the power of the PKK was not as straightforward as had been estimated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0109DEC002249293

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 1995

9 janvier 1995

;       Application No. 22492/93                        by Cemil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC005208299

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

Turkey (no. 18888/02, §§ 44-54, 12 January 2006) and in its judgment of Doğan and Others v.   Turkey (nos.   8803 ‑ 8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 31-35, ECHR 2004-...).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD002918802

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2009

10 mars 2009

    On 4 January 2002 the Court of Cassation's decision was served on the applicant. 14.     On 10 April 2003 the Constitutional Court annulled Article 38 of Law no. 2942. II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0531JUD002395494

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2001

31 mai 2001

Mehmet Emin Akdeniz is the brother of Mehmet Salih Akdeniz and the uncle of Celil Aydoğdu. Sabri Tutuş is the son of Behçet Tutuş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007DEC004862519

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

The applicant filed submissions on 25 January 2018. The defendants filed submissions on 25 January and 22 February 2018. 17 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC001452405

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

In application no. 9180/08, one of the applicants, Mr Şakir Kırıştıoğlu died on 4   July 2013 and on 13 January 2015 his heirs, Ms   Melahat Kırıştıoğlu, Mr   Huriye Yahyaoğlu and Mr &#xa0

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC004188605

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

On 7 January 2008 he filed a claim for compensation with the SMAC. On 28 January 2009 the SMAC rejected the applicant’s case (2008/71E, 2009/114K).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC004005604

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

Dollé, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 September 2004, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Abdullah Yücel, Ms Zarife Çahan, Mr Cemil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0830DEC002341294

Admin. suprême

30 août 1994

30 août 1994

The inquiry appointed by the RHA took evidence on 9, 10 and 12 January 1992. On 2 July 1992, a final draft of the report was submitted to the RHA.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC004338405

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 43384/05 by Cecil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC005487900

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2006

22 juin 2006

Turkey (no. 18888/02, §§ 44-54, 12 January 2006) and in its judgment of Doğan and Others v.   Turkey (nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503JUD007115601

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

  On 14 January 2000 it was submitted to the Tbilisi public prosecutor’s office. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD003498605

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2010

21 septembre 2010

  33379/02, § 28, 10 January 2006; and Karataş and Yıldız and Others v.   Turkey , cited above). IV.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 27.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3160153-3518524

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2010

11 juin 2010

At the time of his death in January 2009 he was serving his sentence at Kosh penitentiary institution (Armenia) for fraud and falsification of documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144663

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2014

12 mai 2014

0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     Communicated on 12 May 2014   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 80442/12 Cecile

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC000204803

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

Turkey (no. 18888/02, §§ 44-54, 12 January 2006) and in its judgment of Doğan and Others v.   Turkey (nos.   8803 ‑ 8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 31-35, ECHR 2004-VI).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC004103406

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2013

5 novembre 2013

Cemile AKSOY (1952)   1.     On 1 January 2005 the Turkish lira (TRY) entered into circulation, replacing the former Turkish lira (TRL). TRY 1 = TRL 1,000,000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-80829

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2007

20 avril 2007

taken to avoid new violations of the same kind (see Resolutions ResDH(2001)70 and ResDH(2001)71 in the cases Aka and Akkuş against Turkey, respectively), in particular through the entry into force on 1 January

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001762191

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 1994

24 novembre 1994

Mr Kemmache joined this application, whereas the third co-accused, Mr Ceccio, opted to be tried immediately.

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 5

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.