Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 25 avril 2022, Mme C B, représentée par Me Cécile Janura, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 28 février 2022 par laquelle

Article 2 : La requête de Mme Janura est rejetée.

    Petition dated 31 January 1994 of Tevfik Sarli to Bitlis public prosecutor   67.   Ramazan and Cemile Sarli were taken by the security forces at 03.00 hours about 40 days ago.

DU 08/ 09/ 2011 *** No MINUTE : No RG : 10/ 08799 Jugement (No 10/ 02235) rendu le 22 Septembre 2010 par le Juge aux affaires familiales de BETHUNE REF : CA/ LL APPELANTE Madame Marie Janina

They left that house with Abdullah, Ramazan and Cemile.

Mr   Cemil İzci, Mr Lezgin İzci, Mr Latif İzci, Mr Naif İzci, Mr Cafer İzci, Mr Hefzullah İzci, Mr Abdullah İzci, Mr Şahin İzci, Ms Cemile Şengül, Ms   Rihan Şengül and Ms Sıtkiye Şengül were

  Hatice CİVELEK   Kaber Celil   CİVELEK   Mehmet CİVELEK   Elife SARI   Ümmü CİVELEK   Fatma CİVELEK   Mustafa CİVELEK   Celil CİVELEK   Meliha CİVELEK

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 23 September 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 35473/23 Janne Cecilie

text-indent:14.2pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communiquée le 29 janvier 2019   DEUXIÈME SECTION Requête n o 4378/12 Cemil

composed of:   Ledi Bianku, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Ivana Jelić, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 25 January

The gendarmes asked where his daughter Cemile was. The applicant said that she was not at home.

    Following Mr Serhat Altun’s demise on 20 January 2016, his brother, Mr   Cemil Altun, expressed his intention to pursue the application and submitted an application form. 3.

  7253/04); Cemil Özvariş, the husband of Zenure   Özvariş and father of Çiğdem, Adem, Selçuk, Güleser and Çimen   Özvariş (no.

On 18 January 2010 the Court decided to communicate the application to the Government with regard to the length of criminal proceedings and the absence of a domestic remedy under Articles 6 § 1 and 13

1998 by Harun Abiloglu and 96 others against Bulgaria and registered on 28 January 1998 under file No. 39553/98;         Having regard to the report provided for in Rule

In the case of Cemil Aydın v.

2005, Having regard to the partial decision of 27 January 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

  ** As amended by Article 11 of Protocol No. 8 (P8-11), which came into force on 1 January 1990.

The applicants Yunis Aydemir and Cemil Aksu suffered burns in the fire.

By a letter dated 26 November 2020 the applicant’s representative was requested to indicate by 7 January 2021 whether the applicant had any heirs   who wished to pursue the proceedings before the