could not be accepted as evidence because they had been done under pressure as V.O.’s family lived in a house belonging to Abbas Ahmadov [the applicant].”

to the doctors, had suddenly fallen ill and died shortly after birth or had urgently been transferred to another hospital where they had died, without the body being given to the family.

Since the applicant had been provided with medical assistance when he had fallen ill in detention, the Constitutional Court found that the administrative authorities had taken the necessary measures to

It must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 17.

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Reisner v.

Once apprehended persons have been brought under control, there can be no justification for striking them .” 55 .

They submitted, however, that there had been fifteen to twenty beds in each room. 21.

On the same day that office wrote to the Gendarme Unit Command, authorising such information to be given, but nothing has been forthcoming.

to be taken.

    Consequently, there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 23.

Vesha Avar saw them take her brother-in-law Hasan Avar out of his house. On the same day, Mehmet Şah Atala was also picked up by the soldiers at Mezire, who had been asking for him by name.

In that video, he can be seen with fresh wounds on his arms.

BAMC’s representative also insisted that the E.S. company should be declared bankrupt, noting that the conversation with the debtor on the resolution of its financial matters had not been successful.

In his complaint, Hasan Başbilen noted that according to a number of news articles published, an investigation had been initiated against a number of officials attached to the Naval Forces suspected of

    The Government submitted that the applicant company could longer claim to be a victim of a violation of its rights guaranteed by the Convention and its Protocols because it had been removed

    Under Article 14 of the Convention the applicants complain that, if the husband had been Swiss and at that time had married a Turkish woman, she could not be expelled as she would have

He had had scratches on his face from the fence and his arms had been twisted behind his back. He had not been thrown to the ground and had not been hit by the police officers.

He requested at the outset that the investigation be postponed until the criminal proceedings against him on the same allegations had been finalised.

The lock had been changed, the circular ring around the lock having fallen off and bearing bullet marks.