La Cour était composée de : Monsieur Gérard LAMBREY, Président Monsieur Jean VEYRE, Conseiller Monsieur Bernard ROUSSEAU, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

s810C3978 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt } .s47E2B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Final resolution DH (99) 453 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 29231/95 LESTIENNE GÉRARD

note of the information regarding the death of some of the applicants indicted in the appended table and the wish of their heirs to continue the proceedings in the stead of their late relatives, as well

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to Interim Resolution DH (97) 600 adopted on 15 December 1997 in the case of Gerrard

[U], gérant et unique associé de la société Transport [U], a cédé l'intégralité de ses parts à la société Arthur Welter France (la société). Aux termes de ce contrat de cession, M.

Par un courrier du 16 novembre 2021, la société Sogal Fabrication Gérardmer a demandé l'autorisation de licencier M.

Gérard, - LA SOCIETE ANONYME MULTYPROMOTION, civilement responsable, contre un arrêt de la cour d'appel de VERSAILLES, 7ème chambre, en date du 20 octobre 1987, qui, pour infractions à la règlementation

  Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2009)61   Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Gérard Bernard against France     Introductory case summary &#xa0

judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 October 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Gerhard

display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 60105/10 and 60113/10 Thomas Richard LESLIE against the United Kingdom and Gerald

frontière allemande, sans cependant vérifier l'exactitude des informations données par cet article de presse, et alors que dans ses propres conclusions d'appel la salariée indiquait elle-même que "le dépôt gérant

WELL 'K' HOME IMMOBILIER C/ S.A.S.U.

FONTAINE, THIRY, WIEDEMANN, avocat au barreau de NANCY INTIMÉ Monsieur [X] [Q] né le [Date naissance 2] 1958 à [Localité 2] (88) domicilié [Adresse 3] Représenté par Me Rémi STEPHAN de la SELARL WELZER

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Gerhard Schmid, Mr Klaus Franz Buttenhauser and Dr.

width:175.28pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13415/06 by Glenn GEBHARD

report drawn up on 15 May 1996 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 14 July 1994 by a French national, Mr Gérard

the report drawn up on 11 January 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 18   November 1991 by Mr Gérard

The applicant was represented by Mr Denis Gerard O’Sullivan of O’Sullivan & Co. Solicitors, a lawyer practising in Cork.

Company Hannover, dont le siège est [Adresse 17] (États-Unis), 12°/ la société Catlin Underwriting Agencies Ltd, dont le siège est [Adresse 6] (Royaume-Uni), venant aux droits de la société Lloyds WEL

00) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Italian nationals, Mr Gerardo