CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-501186-502503
28 février 2002
    Non-pecuniary   costs and expenses   damage (1)     Angelo Giuseppe Guerrera v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610DEC002784107
10 juin 2010
They put forward eight grounds of appeal [3] challenging the judgments of the District Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628JUD003729297
28 juin 2001
As a result, there is only a limited possibility to put forward new facts in the proceedings before the Federal Insurance Court (see Bundesgerichtsentscheide [BGE] 120 V 485). 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD000226412
14 septembre 2023
They took the view that the Government’s statement, based on arguments put forward by the Ministry of the Interior in the domestic civil proceedings, to the effect that C.C. must have hidden the drugs
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD001284605
4 décembre 2008
long as each side is afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis the adversary (see De Haes and Gijsels
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0310JUD002177406
10 mars 2011
must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among other authorities, De Haes and Gijsels
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004120598
6 février 2001
The Court of Appeal noted that in private prosecution cases its examination was limited to the claims put forward by the offended party.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD001177008
17 décembre 2013
consequences of the applicant’s allegations, the matters at stake in the case before the domestic courts could not be decisive except in those circumstances where the value was small or insignificant (see Giusti
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310
26 juin 2012
the Republic of San Marino lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Italian national, Mr   Giuseppe
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1876234-1979335
21 décembre 2006
  The applicants complained that the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor at the Court of Cassation was never served on them, thus depriving them of the opportunity to put forward their
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD001103902
11 octobre 2005
In addition, journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see, the De Haes and Gijsels v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002406104
16 décembre 2010
The Court reiterates that it is unacceptable that an official should be exposed to opprobrium because of matters concerning a member of his family (see De Haes and Gijsels v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001971002
2 novembre 2006
” has the duty to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among many other authorities, De Haes and Gijsels
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD007293110
9 avril 2019
    It examined in detail the circumstances of R.’s transfer to the first applicant’s care and the relations between the first applicant, R.’s parents and R. from that time forward.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD005954510
26 novembre 2013
No such factual information had been put forward by the defendants in the present case. The courts had not therefore erred in finding against them.   II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC001590913
27 août 2013
    In a judgment of 3 October 2000, LJN AA7309, NJ 2000, no. 721, the Supreme Court ruled that the time required to forward the complete case file to it should be taken into account in assessing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD000109204
22 mai 2008
The most recent amendment to Article 505 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dated back to 1960; while it was conceivable that it could have taken a considerable time to forward the case file to the Principal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD004334905
6 avril 2010
There had been reasonable grounds to consider that it had been appropriate to forward all investigation records related to the same set of issues for consideration of charges at the same time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706JUD003752007
6 juillet 2010
    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that the Government have not put forward any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD007308717
5 novembre 2020
In particular, in his appeal on points of law before the Court of Cassation, he had put forward arguments relating to the reasoning of judgment no. 112/2016 of the Court of Appeal and the wrongfulness
Page 3 sur 4