CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

75 résultats pour « Giuseppe Fornaro »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-501186-502503

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

    Non-pecuniary   costs and expenses   damage (1)     Angelo Giuseppe Guerrera v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610DEC002784107

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2010

10 juin 2010

They put forward eight grounds of appeal [3] challenging the judgments of the District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628JUD003729297

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2001

28 juin 2001

As a result, there is only a limited possibility to put forward new facts in the proceedings before the Federal Insurance Court (see Bundesgerichtsentscheide [BGE] 120 V 485). 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD000226412

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

They took the view that the Government’s statement, based on arguments put forward by the Ministry of the Interior in the domestic civil proceedings, to the effect that C.C. must have hidden the drugs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD001284605

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

long as each side is afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis the adversary (see De Haes and Gijsels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0310JUD002177406

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2011

10 mars 2011

must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among other authorities, De Haes and Gijsels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004120598

Admin. suprême

6 février 2001

6 février 2001

The Court of Appeal noted that in private prosecution cases its examination was limited to the claims put forward by the offended party.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD001177008

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2013

17 décembre 2013

consequences of the applicant’s allegations, the matters at stake in the case before the domestic courts could not be decisive except in those circumstances where the value was small or insignificant (see Giusti

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

the Republic of San Marino lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Italian national, Mr   Giuseppe

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1876234-1979335

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2006

21 décembre 2006

  The applicants complained that the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor at the Court of Cassation was never served on them, thus depriving them of the opportunity to put forward their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD001103902

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

In addition, journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see, the De Haes and Gijsels v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002406104

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

The Court reiterates that it is unacceptable that an official should be exposed to opprobrium because of matters concerning a member of his family (see De Haes and Gijsels v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001971002

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

” has the duty to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among many other authorities, De Haes and Gijsels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD007293110

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

    It examined in detail the circumstances of R.’s transfer to the first applicant’s care and the relations between the first applicant, R.’s parents and R. from that time forward.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD005954510

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

No such factual information had been put forward by the defendants in the present case. The courts had not therefore erred in finding against them.   II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC001590913

Admin. suprême

27 août 2013

27 août 2013

    In a judgment of 3 October 2000, LJN AA7309, NJ 2000, no. 721, the Supreme Court ruled that the time required to forward the complete case file to it should be taken into account in assessing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD000109204

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2008

22 mai 2008

The most recent amendment to Article 505 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dated back to 1960; while it was conceivable that it could have taken a considerable time to forward the case file to the Principal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD004334905

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2010

6 avril 2010

There had been reasonable grounds to consider that it had been appropriate to forward all investigation records related to the same set of issues for consideration of charges at the same time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706JUD003752007

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2010

6 juillet 2010

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that the Government have not put forward any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD007308717

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2020

5 novembre 2020

In particular, in his appeal on points of law before the Court of Cassation, he had put forward arguments relating to the reasoning of judgment no. 112/2016 of the Court of Appeal and the wrongfulness

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 4

← PrécédentSuivant →