Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244944
26 août 2025
26 août 2025
Upon appeal, the competent court annulled the pre-trial detention order, finding that there was no serious evidence of guilt. The applicant was released on 4 July 2017.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1202REP002165693
2 décembre 1997
2 décembre 1997
In finding the applicant guilty of the two offences referred to above the trial judge stated, inter alia: "In this case <the applicant> gave an explanation of his behaviour and
Source officiellesoc
61372235cd580146773fb19e
10 mai 1994
10 mai 1994
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société René Guinot, société anonyme dont le siège ... (2e), en cassation d'un
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007DEC001826920
7 octobre 2025
7 octobre 2025
After hearing the parties’ arguments, the court took note that three of the defendants acknowledged their guilt, one defendant refused to admit the charges in full, and the applicant had pleaded not guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC003798397
28 août 2001
28 août 2001
You must not assume he is guilty just because he has not given evidence because, failure to give evidence cannot, on its own prove, prove guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004769899
7 novembre 2000
7 novembre 2000
The court further referred to the statements at the pre-trial investigation of three co-accused, J, S and T, confirming the first applicant’s guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0910DEC006080010
10 septembre 2019
10 septembre 2019
In the course of the trial the applicant admitted guilt in abuse of minors and confirmed the sequence of events as presented by the prosecution, with the exception of the allegations that
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-94
7 février 2012
7 février 2012
The county court held that the applicant could not be acquitted on account of the evidence against him in the case file, which established his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187420
2 octobre 2018
2 octobre 2018
He also submitted that the trial court had invented aggravated circumstances against him, such as his intoxication by alcohol, and had failed to take into account those that mitigated his guilt, such as
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0719DEC000453470
19 juillet 1971
19 juillet 1971
Moreover, the trial of this charge had deliberately been fixed for .. to ..
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1965:1214DEC000251865
14 décembre 1965
14 décembre 1965
that he would not have been found guilty, if his previous convictions had not been known to the jury.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC005489216
25 juin 2019
25 juin 2019
The instant case, however, concerned revocation of the suspension of pre-trial detention. Decisions taken in this context could not be regarded as requiring a prior determination of guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD005866919
3 février 2026
3 février 2026
who are on trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11411
29 novembre 2016
29 novembre 2016
(a) Adversarial nature of the proceedings – The following safeguards had been in place during the trial: (i) at the start of the trial the indictment had been read out in full
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111731
21 mai 2012
21 mai 2012
at the trial stage.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7633
12 juillet 2013
12 juillet 2013
Moreover, under the law of criminal procedure in England it was for a jury in a criminal trial on indictment to assess the prosecution evidence and to determine the guilt of the accused.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0603DEC003406723
3 juin 2025
3 juin 2025
Applicant’s trial 13 .
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917JUD001667822
17 septembre 2024
17 septembre 2024
of those who were on trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD001710310
27 février 2014
27 février 2014
By virtue of that principle, no measures effectively amounting to a penalty may be taken against a defendant without his guilt having been established beforehand at a proper trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211555
9 juillet 2021
9 juillet 2021
A common trial had been conducted against the applicant, R. and S. but following R.’s and S.’s admission of guilt at one of the hearings the charges against them were severed and they were tried separately
Source officiellePage 3 sur 184