CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC001250721
3 octobre 2024
extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the prohibition on holding peaceful assemblies or restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events (see, for example, Mustafa Hajili
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219DEC002673721
19 décembre 2024
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD004211912
24 novembre 2016
  In the case of Mustafa Hajili v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD005336018
8 février 2024
However, the declarations did not offer a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the cases (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209JUD001992512
9 décembre 2021
Hajili and Mrs Z.   Sadigova, lawyers based in Strasbourg and Baku respectively. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç.   Əsgərov. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0829DEC003339412
29 août 2024
Hajili and Ms Z.
1re chambre sociale
626a2f4571469e057d789a90
27 avril 2022
mais avec les soucis qu'il y a en ce moment nos prises de tête n'auraient pas cessé et je m'excuse sincèrement de t'avoir laissé tomber et que tu aies été en galère à cause de moi' Je suis enceinte et dois
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0216JUD000721813
16 février 2023
The Court also does not overlook the fact that the applicant was not given an opportunity to question N.A., who was summoned to the trial in his capacity as a witness and attended one hearing, making his
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC003097910
2 avril 2013
This does not in itself disclose any lack of good faith or will on the part of the authorities. In the circumstances, it is premature to impugn the response of the authorities as ineffective.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD007790912
20 septembre 2022
Ukraine , no. 39424/02, § 60, ECHR 2008, and Hajili v. Azerbaijan , no.   6984/06, §§ 49-58, 10 January 2012). 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0926JUD005631711
26 septembre 2019
    The Court reiterates that Article 11 of the Convention only protects the right to “peaceful assembly”, a notion which does not cover a demonstration where the organisers and participants
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607DEC002820310
7 juin 2022
    The Court reiterates that Article 10 of the Convention does not confer on the individual a right of access to information held by a public authority, nor does it oblige the State to impart
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0202JUD003471710
2 février 2023
  Hajili and Mr   E.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0319DEC001718418
19 mars 2024
The Court has also established that it is for the heir who wishes to pursue the proceedings before the Court to substantiate his or her standing to do so (see Belskiy v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD000117212
8 juillet 2021
Hajili and Mrs   Z.   Zakaryayeva (Sadigova), lawyers based in France and Azerbaijan respectively. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC006434411
29 mai 2018
    The Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application inasmuch as
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319JUD002200411
19 mars 2020
    The relevant provisions of the domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment are described in detail in the Court’s judgment in Mustafa Hajili v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD006737411
30 janvier 2020
The Court has already found that the criminal inquiry in the case of M.H. was flawed and in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Mustafa Hajili , cited above, §§ 45-53). 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD001350912
2 mars 2023
It does not see any reason to depart from that finding in the present case. Accordingly, it dismisses the Government’s objection. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD003179310
22 avril 2021
    The relevant domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment is summarised in the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§   26-28, 24 November 2016).
Page 3 sur 5