Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0410DEC002789195
10 avril 1997
10 avril 1997
Meanwhile the applicant's lawyer had lodged a complaint with the Investigation Supervisory Department of the Attorney General's Office (Legfobb Ügyészség Nyomozás Felügyeleti
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0115DEC002845395
15 janvier 1997
15 janvier 1997
On 18 February 1994 the Attorney General's Office (Legfobb Ügyészség Nyomozás Felügyeleti Foosztály) dismissed the applicant's complaint against the decision of 6 December
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0115DEC002319894
15 janvier 1997
15 janvier 1997
On 9 February 1994 the Attorney General's Office (Legfobb Ügyészség) dismissed the applicant's complaint. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0113DEC002320994
13 janvier 1997
13 janvier 1997
On 25 October 1989 the Attorney General (Legfobb Ugyész) lodged an appeal on legal grounds (törvényességi óvás) with the Supreme Court against the judgments of 1965 and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002217293
15 mai 1996
15 mai 1996
In his letter of 1 July 1993, the Deputy of the Prosecutor General (Legfobb Ügyéesz Helyettese) "offered" (felajánlás) the criminal proceedings against inter alia the applicant
Source officiellePage 3 sur 3