C a lu son rapport, - et entendu les observations de Me Mira-Marthe-Rose, représentant M. et Mme B, qui conclut aux mêmes fins que la requête et par les mêmes moyens, - et les observations de Me Burel

Pejchal, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Jovan Ilievski, judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on 8 February 2013 and 11 March

27/02/1949 Romano Giovanni Rome 12/07/2018 02/01/2018 1,300 250   32935/07 16/07/2007 Ludovico MAZZARELLA 15/08/1932 Villa Paolo Rome 12/07/2018 13/02/2018 5,200 250   47850/07 08/10/2007 Giulio

Loznica   11/07/2007   20731/13 13/03/2013 Mira UMIĆEVIĆ 27/02/1953 Serbian   1. Loznica   21/12/2004; 24/01/20052. 2. Loznica   15/11/2006 ; 28/12/2006 1.

* * * * * APRES DÉBATS à l'audience publique tenue le 15 Février 2022, devant : Madame ROSA-SCHALL, Conseillère faisant fonction de Présidente et Madame ASSELAIN, Conseillère chargée

was postponed to 20 March 1984.

représentée par la SCP BLANC AMSELLEM-MIMRAN CHERFILS, avoués à la Cour, ayant la SCP WILSON-DAUMAS-BERGE-ROSSI (ASS), avocats au barreau de MARSEILLE CAISSE PRIMAIRE D'ASSURANCE MALADIE DES BOUCHES

LLLLTUV , domiciliée [...] , 144°/ Mme Martha AAAAAAAAA... , domiciliée [...] , 145°/ Mme BBBBBBBBB... , domiciliée [...] , 146°/ Mme Sania SSSSSSSSSS...

Procédure «   Pinto   »   : Introduite le 24/09/2001 devant la cour d'appel de Rome. Décision du 24/01/2002, déposée le 14/02/2002. Constat de violation.

Romania , no. 21911/03, § 29, 24 March 2009).

  29865/96, ECHR 2004 ‑ X (extracts); Losonci Rose and Rose v.   Switzerland , no. 664/06, 9 November 2010); Garnaga v. Ukraine , no.

  6853/74, Commission decision of 9 March 1977, DR 9, p. 27).

The applicant in the second case, Ms Mira Gojković, is a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina, who was born in 1955 and also lives in Serbia. She was represented before the Court by Mr B. Ćupović. 2.

On 8 March 2000 the Mersin Assize Court heard the applicant and his legal representative.

On 23 January 2007, 22 September 2008, 31 December 2008 and 4   March 2009 the domestic courts awarded the applicants certain sums against “Slap group AD Beograd – Fabrika u Čačku” (“the debtor”).

    On 29 March 2010 the investigation was resumed. 40.

Trančíková (“the applicant”), on 21   March   2012. 2.

    The applicant having failed to collect the first two summonses to the hearing which was to take place on 22 January 2002, the hearing was rescheduled for 29 March 2002.

The court established that in February-March 2000 the applicant, the then Head of the Sarapul Town Property Management Committee, had detected certain irregularities in the privatisation of a local brewery

on 24 January 2001, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together, Having regard to the partial decision of 22 March