CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611DEC000459723
11 juin 2024
It was made clear that the compensation scheme related exclusively to privately owned property and that the individual claims of injured parties were of a moral, rather than legal nature, since the tax
Page 3 sur 47
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229731
29 novembre 2023
November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged failure of the respondent State to protect the applicant’s reputation from a purportedly defamatory publication posted on a privately-owned
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1621
5 mars 2009
The authorities decided not to open an official investigation as they found that the acts complained of constituted an offence for which prosecution had to be brought privately by the victim.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1214JUD004096798
14 décembre 1999
; (Requête n° 40967/98) ARRÊT STRASBOURG 14 décembre 1999 DÉFINITIF 14/03/2000 En l’affaire Privitera
J.E.X
66425813879c8a875bd4612e
30 avril 2024
barreau de BOURGOIN-JALLIEU ayant pour avocat postulant Me Garance JACQUEMOND-COLLET, avocat au barreau de LYON DEFENDERESSE Mme [L] [I] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO
ECLI:CEDH:002-5571
26 février 2002
However, a number of expert witnesses instructed privately by an association that defended children’s rights proved favourable to the applicants and expressed the view that the children should be returned
Jurid. Premier Président
6440d7e0e704a005d1ed6f64
19 avril 2023
JURIDICTION DU PREMIER PRESIDENT ORDONNANCE DE REFERE DU 19 Avril 2023 DEMANDERESSE : Mme [J] [E] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO
ECLI:CEDH:001-173666
26 avril 2017
It does not appear from the case materials that the investigation identified the owner of the electric transformer although it was speculated that it might have been a bankrupt privately owned company.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187183
28 septembre 2018
xa0; FOURTH SECTION Application no. 38636/17 Petar RODIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged on 18 May 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant had a protected tenancy right since 1975 on a privately-owned
ECLI:CEDH:001-158970
5 novembre 2015
According to section 4, only privately-owned operators, which had been granted licences for a nationwide coverage of territory (“national broadcasters”), were invited to participate in the beauty-contest
ECLI:CEDH:001-209204
16 mars 2021
The prosecutor found that only a privately prosecutable offence, namely light bodily harm, had been committed and the conditions under Article 49 of the CCP were not met.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1836
6 novembre 2008
In so far as the charge of insult was concerned, at the relevant time it was a privately prosecutable offence and could not attract a sentence of imprisonment.
ECLI:CEDH:001-162985
20 avril 2016
Criminal proceedings opened against the applicant On 31 October 2011 the Bucharest Prosecutor’s Office indicted the applicant for embezzlement, fraud and forgery of privately signed documents
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004430698
6 mai 2003
His letter read as follows: “... the Galleries is unique in as much as although it is the Town Centre, it is also privately owned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD000117506
23 juin 2020
Section 21 provided that State-owned dwellings which had previously been privately owned property would not be subject to privatisation under the Privatisation Act.
ECLI:CEDH:001-218522
20 juin 2022
In 2019 the applicant was found guilty of the criminal offence of serious shaming ( teško sramoćenje ) of her neighbours for stating in front of three people, privately in an office, that they were “criminals
8ème chambre
68f07da6bfd83326c7063845
15 octobre 2025
l'incident (bénéficiaire d'une aide juridictionnelle Totale numéro 69123-2025-003440 du 19/06/2025 accordée par le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 7]) Représentée par Me Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0916JUD002956995
16 septembre 1999
On 10 October 1994 one of the privately commissioned experts filed his report with the Youth Court registry.
ECLI:CEDH:001-221444
10 novembre 2022
The applicant made a statement, alleging that such a situation was due to the actions a certain Dr P., employed in a privately-owned hospital, who had served as head of a local health authority between
ECLI:CEDH:001-138459
22 octobre 2013
The Constitutional Court reiterated the same reasoning applied in the case of Alvin Privitera and Esron Pullicino cited above.