Section 132 § 2 (b) provides for the same sanction for a violent sexual assault committed by a group of persons.

On another count of aggravated tax fraud the applicant was accused of not declaring the salaries paid and, consequently, the taxes and social security payments had been too low.

The same applied for the tax years 2002 and 2003. The taxation decisions had all become final before the charge of aggravated tax fraud, which concerned the same matter, was pressed.

The second applicant, Anna Aleksandrovna Krivulya, was born in 1975 and lives in the same town. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

The compensation was calculated on the basis of prices listed in several notarial deeds for land in the same area, and ranged between 0.19 and 0.40 Bulgarian levs (BGN), or about 0.10-0.20 euros (EUR),

His requests to the domestic courts to seek an alternative expert opinion on his mental state had been systematically rejected too.

On the same day the Trebnje Local Court dismissed the charges of forgery and false certification. 5.

The proceedings did not therefore arise from the same facts. 28.

In 2000, the Constitutional Court dismissed a complaint by the applicant, although it did found the approach of the police authority and public security authority to have been too narrow.

Therefore it was really a question of one act and the same circumstances. 29.

C B actuellement retenu au centre de rétention administrative de Bordeaux, représenté par Me Samb Tosco demande au tribunal : 1°) de lui accorder le bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire ;

Furthermore, it was clear that the second offence arose from the same facts as the first offence.

At around 5.10 p.m. the applicant got assaulted by a group of 8 to 10   people, the same “skinhead” looking persons spotted earlier next to the demonstration.

On the same day he again requested international protection in Poland together with his family – his wife and, at that time, their two children.

The applicants applied for a judicial review of the expropriation decision, arguing in particular that the compensation awarded to them was too low.

On 7 January 2009 the same prosecutor’s office invalidated its previous decision of 7 August 2008 and decided to re-open the criminal proceedings against the applicant in connection with the same offence

The crimes concerned the same period as the above-mentioned tax decisions, that is, the year 2002.

The crime concerned the same period as the above-mentioned tax decisions, that is, the year 2002.

The reasons given in all the orders extending her pre-trial detention had been too brief and too abstract, since they went no further than mentioning certain statutory criteria while omitting to specify

right to liberty and security), he complained that, following the authorities’ refusal to extend his residence permit, he was detained unlawfully in 2003 in a deportation centre and was kept there for too