Idris Prosser, no. 75995/01, lodged on 20 August 2001 The applicant is a British national who was born on 10 September 1932 and who lives in Newport, Gwent.

He alleges that the Court of Cassation discounted the criminal proceedings against his co-accused on the grounds of statute of limitations whereas they did not consider the same for him despite the fact

The same considerations must also apply to adult siblings (see, for example, Onur v. the United Kingdom , no. 27319/07, § 45, 17 February 2009).

On the same day, while he was in Bismil, he was informed by an acquaintance about an incident in the Kamberli village.

On the same day Imam Boztaş’s parents made an official complaint to the Mazgirt public prosecutor’s office.

On 6 January 2000 the Assembly of Chambers of the Supreme Military Administrative Court ( Askeri Yüksek İdare Mahkemesi Daireler Kurulu ) rejected the applicant’s claim on the ground that she had to introduce

Two of the applicants, namely Mr İdris Yiğit and Mr Nuri Akalın, were granted legal aid. 3.

    On 13 September 1994 the public prosecutor in the Diyarbakır State Security Court filed a bill of indictment with the same court.

    On the same day, the special team arrested 13 villagers including the applicant’s son and her daughter.

Mr Marttinen alleges that the   fact that he was fined in debt recovery proceedings   for refusing to give an overall account of his assets and other financial means, although at the same time

    La Cour considère que ce grief est recevable ( Saadi , précité, § 152).

Turquie 14/11/2016 İdris ASAN   40 75791/16 Seyhan c. Turquie 14/11/2016 Edat Yücel SEYHAN Hüseyin AYGÜN 41 75792/16 Güngör c. Turquie 16/11/2016 Mesut GÜNGÖR Nazan GÜNGÖR 42 75793/16 Kılıç c.

At about 3.30 p.m., the same soldiers raided the village again. They asked why some of the houses had not burned.

  On 25 October 2000 the public prosecutor instituted proceedings against two gendarmes, İdris Yıldırım and Tuncay Beden, for ill-treatment.

It referred to the reasons given in the same judgment for rejecting a request to declare void similar provisions in Article 27 of Law no.

Superman, of IDIN . Mr Ioannidis sat with the applicant in the back of the car. 15.

    On the same day the Ankara State Security Court ordered the applicant's detention on remand. 12.

Elle réfute ensuite toute fausse déclaration intentionnelle sur le fondement de l'article L. 221-14 du code de la mutualité au motif que le diagnostic d'un syndrome d'activation mastocytaire (SAMA) à l'origine

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 4.