CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68031

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2004

22 décembre 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Işık case delivered on 5   June   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56125

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the M.T. and others case delivered on 17 July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117015

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

This decision became final on 2 June 2006. On 28 June 2006 the customs authority invited the applicant to recover the laptop.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235415

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2024

1 juillet 2024

This judgment became final on 7 January 2022, no appeal having been lodged against it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621DEC000400905

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

The applicant’s subsequent appeal was dismissed by the Sisak County Court on 4 July 2000, while the prosecution for the offence with which the applicant was charged became time-barred on 21 July 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244234

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2025

18 juin 2025

On 16 March 2023, one of the children having reached majority and become financially independent, the applicant asked the court to put into effect/acknowledge ( dare atto ) the new arrangements put in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1523

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

The discontinuance of the proceedings against F.G. was subsequently ordered and became final with a judgment of the Supreme Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56377

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kutzner case delivered on 26   February 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-67525

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jokela case delivered on 21 May 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9279

Admin. suprême

4 février 2014

4 février 2014

It is unclear when exactly the police became aware that he was a journalist. Subsequently, a district court found him guilty of disobeying police orders but decided not to impose a penalty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD005077513

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

13)                 JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction)       STRASBOURG   17 April 2018   FINAL   17/07/2018   This judgment has become

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2003:226

CJUE

10 avril 2003

10 avril 2003

. # Appeal - Officials - Resettlement Allowance - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate. # Case C-217/01 P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD003871903

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

Those judgments were not appealed against and became effective. 10.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cd8abd3db21cbdd939c3

Appel

10 février 2017

10 février 2017

Représenté et assisté sur l'audience par Me Jean-marie BECAM de la SELARL BECAM/ MONCALIS, avocat au barreau d'ESSONNE, substitué sur l'audience par Me Philippe MONCALIS, avocat au barreau d'ESSONNE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC000822904

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

Consequently, she became ill. Her parental home was still not finished.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2001:412

CJUE

12 juillet 2001

12 juillet 2001

#Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, Glaxo Group Ltd, The Wellcome Foundation Ltd, SmithKline Beecham plc, Beecham Group plc, SmithKline & French Laboratories Ltd i Eli Lilly and Co

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0430DEC004900509

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2019

30 avril 2019

    In the instant case the Court notes that the applicant was released on 7   February 2011 with his release pursuant to Article 102 § 2 of the CCP, whereas his conviction became final

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0306JUD003840502

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2008

6 mars 2008

The judgments were not appealed against and became final ten days after the delivery. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0826DEC004792413

Admin. suprême

26 août 2021

26 août 2021

decision, delivered following a review of the first-instance court’s judgment, becomes final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD002868606

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

    On 15 March 2004 this judgment became final. 13.

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →