les décisions de refus de visa d'entrée en France a rejeté le recours dirigé contre la décision de l'autorité consulaire française à Lagos refusant de délivrer des visas de long séjour à Success B et Favour

MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the failure of the Albanian authorities to execute the final decisions which made executable an international arbitration court decision (the decision) in favour

He was called “a degenerate”, “a faggot” and “a shitty asshole”, it was suggested that he should be “peed on”, he was urged “not to advertise faggots”, it was also suggested that he “should be prosecuted

    Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant complained that the judgments adopted in her favour remained unenforced.

That the judgments in the applicant company’s favour became binding and enforceable before the supervisory review does not alter the Court’s conclusion.

    The judgment given in the applicant’s favour remains unenforced to the present date. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW A.

2005 with the exception of the judgment in favour of Mr   Korniyenko, which remains unenforced (see Annex for details). 6.

    On 16 March 2000 the Centru District Court ruled in favour of X and dismissed the applicant's action. The applicant appealed. 10.

    Between 2008 and 2012 he lodged numerous complaints about the failure to enforce the judgment in his favour to no avail.

#Recurso de anulación — Ayudas de Estado — Desgravaciones de las cargas sociales en favor de las empresas de los territorios de Venecia y Chioggia — Decisión por la que se declara la incompatibilidad con

  1 concerning the non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicant's favour to the Government.

    First judgment in the applicant's favour 6.

    The applicant complained about the length of the non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour.

  1 concerning the non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicant's favour to the Government.

  1 concerning the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicant's favour to the Government.

The court however did not allow the applicant's claims for compensation because the judgment of 6   February 2001 in his favour was enforced.

    Judicial awards in the applicants’ favour against the FGUP and their enforcement In 2008 the applicants brought proceedings against the FGUP challenging their dismissal, requesting to be

Those decisions in the applicants’ favour became final and enforceable but the State delayed their enforcement.

Those decisions in the applicants’ favour became final and enforceable but the State delayed their enforcement.