Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD001800202
16 juillet 2009
16 juillet 2009
At that time, there were two people, a man and woman, in the restaurant, but I don’t know who they were...” 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608DEC002301807
8 juin 2010
8 juin 2010
Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants, Ms Violeta Andovska, Ms Elica Nedevska, Ms Ljubica Teova, Ms Silvana Popovska and Ms Nikolina Atanasova are Macedonian nationals who were
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC004233504
26 mai 2009
26 mai 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414DEC003173003
14 avril 2009
14 avril 2009
The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Ms V.
Source officiellePôle 1 - Chambre 10
65449d78c71a6a83181c8ed4
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
la société West Elysées de sa demande en paiement de la somme de 20 000 euros à titre de dommages et intérêts ; - rejeter les demandes de la société West Elysées en application de l'article 700 du code
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC003746604
26 mai 2009
26 mai 2009
The next day the applicant and his father went to the police station and the applicant was arrested.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3256182-3856168
15 septembre 2010
15 septembre 2010
The Versailles Court of Appeal upheld the refusal, taking the view that the legal consequences of the requested order were not compatible with the child’s best interests.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1849493-1956218
30 novembre 2006
30 novembre 2006
Her statements were said to be based on repressed memories which she had been able to recover with the aid of a therapist, Mr Kieft, who had been treating her for six years.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408DEC000081413
8 avril 2014
8 avril 2014
(“the second applicant”), are Iranian nationals, who were born in 1963 and 1970 respectively and live in Baku.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2888205-3171910
8 octobre 2009
8 octobre 2009
On several occasions their detention was extended and their applications for release were dismissed on similar grounds until they were finally convicted.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC004383906
26 février 2008
26 février 2008
They were represented before the Court by Mr B. Schreiber, a lawyer practising in Cologne, Germany. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mrs A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC003770303
16 juin 2009
16 juin 2009
The applicants, who were spouses, were represented before the Court by Mrs K. Boncheva and Mr M. Ekimdzhiev, lawyers practising in Plovdiv.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204107
3 juillet 2020
3 juillet 2020
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } Communicated on 3 July 2020 Published on 20 July 2020 THIRD SECTION Application no. 61019/19 María Isabel
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0212JUD000567806
12 février 2015
12 février 2015
The applicants were not the subjects of any criminal investigation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC000898411
6 septembre 2011
6 septembre 2011
In June 2008 the applicant and T. went on holiday to Ukraine with Sh.’s consent. They were supposed to return by the middle of August 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC000088007
2 septembre 2008
2 septembre 2008
Various expert statements about the quality of the water were produced, inter alia on 17 October 1989, 4 July 1990, 1 November 1992, 3 June 1997, 30 July and 19 November 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC000668902
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
In January and February 2000 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant on suspicion of embezzlement, tax evasion and forgery.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023DEC001095707
23 octobre 2012
23 octobre 2012
At the time of the events, the applicants were students at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD002037813
9 juillet 2015
9 juillet 2015
were sent to the relevant specialised laboratories. 61.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513DEC003490904
13 mai 2008
13 mai 2008
The applicant in his written reply requested the Court to reject the Government’s proposal arguing that the requirements of Article 37 § 1 c of the Convention were not met.
Source officiellePage 30 sur 131